The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The Curran Prophecy

Posted on June 06, 2013 by

ANDREW NEIL, 5-6-2013: Would you keep child benefit for better-off taxpayers?

MARGARET CURRAN: Well, what we are saying, and Ed will make his own speech tomorrow, and I don’t have foresight of that… What we are saying is when you get into government, and when we come in in 2015, we won’t be able to do all that we wanted to do… Will child benefit for the wealthiest people be our top priority? I’m not sure about that.

ED MILIBAND, 6-6-2013: When it comes to the decisions of the next Labour government it won’t be our biggest priority to overturn the decisions this government has made on taking child benefit away from families earning over £50,000 a year.

We must admit, for someone who hasn’t seen the speech it’s a heck of a guess. Does anyone want to ask Ms Curran if she’s got a score forecast for Croatia vs Scotland?

29 to “The Curran Prophecy”

  1. ianbrotherhood says:

     
    Perhaps the cohesion of the thought and relatively unscathed syntax is more of a clue than the substance of the comment.

    Reply
  2. handclapping says:

    Of course she wont have seen the whole speech. It was written by a series of commissions debating each idea and then sewn together at the last moment. Sort of like designing a horse in committee. And what a jockey! Definitely worth the odds.

    Reply
  3. YesYesYes says:

    After a Yes vote next year maybe Mystic Magrit could be employed to predict the numbers in an independent Scotland’s Lotto. 

    Reply
  4. crisiscult says:

    2-1 to Scotland is my prediction. Croatia were better off together. Why did they break up a union of almost a century, and their team of 1990 was great.

    Reply
  5. G. Campbell says:

    “Does anyone want to ask Ms Curran if she’s got a score forecast for Croatia vs Scotland?”

    Foreigners 3 – 0 North Brits *

    * my forecast, actually, but done in a Mags stylee

    Reply
  6. Davy says:

    Just dont ask her about Denis Healey ????????????

    Reply
  7. Jim Mitchell says:

     
    Davy says:, Ah but then Davy it’s fore-site that seems to be her strong suit, not hind-site! but then Labour don’t like looking back as they might be reminded of what they were actually founded for!

    Reply
  8. Ron says:

    There’s a scarier possibility Rev … Ed Miliband is getting his ideas from Mags.

    Reply
  9. ianbrotherhood says:

    @handclapping-
     
     ‘Sort of like designing a horse in committee.’
     
    Aye. People like Curran, Lamont, Miliband, Darling etc were designed by committee – whatever individuality or creativity they once possessed has been sandblasted away by decades of being instructed what to think and say, how to talk, walk, dress, respond to every possible question etc etc.
     
    They don’t ‘believe’ anything more than a barrelled dog ‘believes’ it’s improving its lot by barking at anyone who may rattle the protruding stick.
     
    FTWFLOT 

    Reply
  10. HighlandMartin says:

    Good one @crisiscult
     
    Having being overexercised in the media, our St Maggie was sent to Donside this evening, tweeting pics of the sky in Aberdeen. 
    God bless this gift to the Vote Yes campaign.
     
     

    Reply
  11. Red squirrel says:

    Speech must have been written by Dada engine – randomly generated and meaningless. Actually that would probably be an improvement.

    Reply
  12. Stevie says:

    The BritNats are the dirtiest bunch of liars and self-serving cheats I’ve ever seen and they are utter rubbish at lying to boot.
    Why don’t our fellow Scots see it?

    Reply
  13. Jiggsbro says:

    Why don’t our fellow Scots see it?
     
    They do. They’ve just given up on politicians in general and don’t imagine that they’d be any better in independent Scotland. Or they simply have a tribal allegiance and trust that Labour knows best what’s needed, without really bothering themselves with details. The biggest obstacle to a Yes vote is not the farcical scaremongering of BT, it’s the carefully crafted apathy and cynicism of the electorate.

    Reply
  14. Bobby Mckail says:

    I think the most important fact of today is that all of Scotland now knows that Labour are just Tory’s in red. It was always going to happen that they had to out Tory the Tories on welfare, it was just a matter of the timing. Though I think Johann Lamont was seriously deluding herself if she thought she’d get away with kicking her cuts commission into the long grass until after the referendum, that was overly pessimistic.
    Now Johann will not be able to get away with “We want to have an honest debate” anymore. She has already stated that welfare should not be devolved, but 70%+ want welfare transferred to Holyrood.
    This kind of thing is going to feature more and more over the coming months and the obfuscation tactics used will start to crumble all around Labour and their Tory Better Together bedfellows!
     

    Reply
  15. ianbrotherhood says:

     
    Who is Tychy?
     
    Does s/he have extra powers?
     
    Some kind of SuperTroll?
     
    (Whoever ye are? ye write well – nice cadence…pal.)

    Reply
  16. Adrian B says:

    Who is Tychy?
     
    I think it is Tobias Smollett, he called the rev a brown shirt and wrote this on the heavy nudge thread :
    “If you don’t like people disagreeing with your narrow censorious arbitrary counter-productive philosophy regarding songs sung at the football, don’t post such blatantly anti-freedom of speech articles.”
    Hmmmm – the article went straight over someones head and he saw it as something it wasn’t. He wasn’t the only one that made that mistake as you may remember. He can write well, his comments were always well written.
     
     

    Reply
  17. Holebender says:

    Why don’t our fellow Scots see it?
     
    Because they’re watching the BBC?

    Reply
  18. Adrian B says:

    Its all kicking off again in Glasgow Labour :
     
    link to newsnetscotland.com
     
    “George Redmond’s been sacked for disloyalty. When he got the SPT job he was told it would require him to be supportive of the leader. Instead, he’s been briefing against him, trying to undermine him. Even the dogs in the street knew he was wanting a challenge to Gordon.”

    Reply
  19. john king says:

    Jiggsbro says:
    7 June, 2013 at 12:36 am

    “Why don’t our fellow Scots see it?”
     
    Could not agree more, the no campaigns only weapon is to create such confusion and apathy in the electorate as to put them off the referendum all together, however, if there were to be a low turnout (god forbid) I think we all know who would win don’t we?
    I’m not sure they’ve thought that game plan through enough, but as the man says
    don’t interrupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake  

    Reply
  20. john king says:

    Unless you live on a beach, or are independently wealthy, there’s no ideal place to be unemployed. Compounding wounded egos and self-confidence, unemployment benefits represent a fraction of a worker’s previous salary and leave those without jobs short on bills, mortgage payments and living expenses.
     
    But in some countries that fraction is bigger than others.
     
    Laid-off Danes who have worked 52 weeks over the previous three years are eligible to receive 90% of their average earnings for up to four years

     
    Unemployed job seekers in Norway and Finland are almost as well off. In Norway the unemployed receive 87.6% of their previous salaries for 500 days and in Finland they receive 85.1% of their previous salaries for one year.
     
    And in Sweden, Israel, Japan and Germany, the unemployed can claim benefits worth between 66% and 90% of their last salaries.

    When we delve into the OECD’s Social Expenditure database we can see that the UK is ranked significantly below many other European nations in terms of the money it spends on welfare, including France, Germany and Italy.
     
    Britain, something for nothing eh?

    Reply
  21. Holebender says:

    …which is why I am frequently gobsmacked by the hard of thinking who claim various Johnny Foreigners are going to uproot their entire families and flit to Blighty with the sole purpose of living the life of Riley off our “generous benefits system”! Let’s face it, if you were going to go to all the trouble of moving somewhere to live off welfare wouldn’t you choose somewhere where the pay scale made it worth your while?

    Reply
  22. Desimond says:

    It isnt the power of Prophecy…Maggie has clearly taken a wee sly peek into the Directive Letter that true Labour KingPin Johann told her to pass on to wee General Ed in London

    Reply
  23. gerry parker says:

    Strange thing the media, especially the BBC.
    This blog yesterday had a lot of comments, none of them very kind to Whitehall.  Today they are all gone…..
    link to bbc.co.uk
     
     

    Reply
  24. scottish_skier says:

    Political wing of the British terrorist paramilitary group the Ulster Volunteer Force is to join the pro-union campaign.

    link to heraldscotland.com

    Ulster unionists in Scots poll protest

    THE political party affiliated with loyalist paramilitary group the Ulster Volunteer Force is to visit Scotland as part of its opposition to the independence referendum.

    UVF, UKIP, BNP, EDL, Orange Order…

    Reply
  25. john king says:

    Unelected TORY PEER  lord Strathclyde describes a democratically elected government policy of independence “poison”
    “Thursday’s Scottish Daily Mail reported: “The battle against the ‘poison’ of Scottish nationalism reached London yesterday with the launch of a new campaign aimed at convincing English-based Scots to join the fight to save the UK. At yesterday’s launch, Lord Strathclyde branded First Minister’s independence dream as ‘poison’ …” 
    humbug anyone? 
    this from a man for whom noone has ever put an x in a box to elect him, thinks the stated will of a substantial (and growing) proportion of the Scottish electorate
    is poison, 
    just who the hell does he think he is? and what future for his ilk in an independent Scotland?

    Reply
  26. Robert Kerr says:

    Read this and weep !
    link to en.wikipedia.org.
    Then back to the Good Fight !
     

    Reply
  27. les calthorps says:

    LORD STRATHCLYDE—-just following in the footsteps of his grandfather who was a proper b——d, he, the grandfather, could not raise the funds to buy out one of his tenants so he commenced a course of intimidation and harassment on the said tenant, resulting, when he was exposed, in his having to resign as Under Secretary of State For Scotland. His Westminster friends kept his nose in the trough by shortly thereafter appointing him chairman of a large Scottish quango. 

    Reply
  28. les calthorps says:

    I should have mentioned that the exposure of Lord Strathclyde took place in the Court of Session in Edinburgh making his subsequent appointment a blatant kick in the teeth to all Scots, we of course have suffered many such slights from our lords and masters since that time.

    Reply
  29. Ron Maclean says:

    I wonder what he had to do to become Peer of the Year twice.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,267 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “@ YL Sah! says: 4 July, 2025 at 4:39 am “glory hole frequenter” “boyfriend” “trying to pigeonhole me” You pigeonhole…Jul 4, 07:31
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “@Dan – that is a fair point re immigration, that a competent independent administration could chose who to seek to…Jul 4, 07:07
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “I think you misunderstand. I’m not engaging with whatever senseless rant you’ve posted on the internet in the wee hours…Jul 4, 06:53
    • Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “Is that it??!? Well that’s a great big resounding 0 out of 10 on the witty rejoinder and well thought…Jul 4, 04:58
    • Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “P3nisbreath McP3nisbreathface: Nope; WRONG! Never applied to them, they didn’t do night school and it was too far to travel…Jul 4, 04:39
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Now let’s be honest here “Factchecker”; Tam Dalziel was the doyen of the then Labour awkward squad who delighted (from…Jul 4, 04:17
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “God yes, the Lockerbie case was shocking.Jul 3, 21:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “@Dan The UK doesn’t have control over immigration. That means that Scotland is really no different to England. And no.…Jul 3, 19:56
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Where’s the FUN in THAT?Jul 3, 19:34
    • Dan on The Con Merchant: “@Aidan Scotland does not have control over immigration, so we currently have no way to ensure the type of immigrant…Jul 3, 19:00
    • Andrew scott on Too Tight To Mention: “Better if posts are RELEVANT TO THE ISSUE THE REV PUTS UPJul 3, 18:59
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “I was rather peeved when the Lockerbie trial, run by the Scottish legal establishment, put the wrong man behind bars.…Jul 3, 18:55
    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “Can you tell us which university knocked back your application, YL Sah! My money’s on Edinburgh.Jul 3, 18:44
    • Dave Hansell on Too Tight To Mention: “Something like this, perhaps? https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2020-05-22/thurrock-council-borrowed-1bn-from-taxpayers-to-bet-on-british-sunshineJul 3, 18:03
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “All true. But what are we going to do about it? These grifters have closed nearly every avenue to move…Jul 3, 18:02
    • factchecker on Too Tight To Mention: “The EVEL procedure was an answer to the West Lothian Question, first identified by Scottish MP Tam Dalziell in 1977.…Jul 3, 17:40
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?” That almost no one agrees with your analysis of the situation? It’s…Jul 3, 17:19
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Andrew Scott, Its simply a matter of scrolling on by if you are not interested in realising that Westminsters governance…Jul 3, 16:29
    • 100%Yes on Too Tight To Mention: “The big question is, how is the SNP still alive and kicking. I do not believe for a minute the…Jul 3, 15:34
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Indeed, «hiding»in plain sight and all perfectly normal in Yookay.. It seems the British state functions on the accommodating body…Jul 3, 15:17
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: “And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?Jul 3, 15:02
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “Again we keep coming to this issue of the preservation of sovereignty. In the context you mean it, sovereignty means…Jul 3, 14:52
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: “Semantics, at the end of the day. The substantive point still stands, whether or not you think you’ve answered Aiden’s…Jul 3, 14:42
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: ““Ah, a classic case of hinging an entire argument off a single, extreme outlier argument” Maybe it escaped your attention,…Jul 3, 14:31
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “I think it’s about time we looked seriously at these Trade Union representatives. 1. They don’t understand the Law. 2.…Jul 3, 14:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “this is why I miss, such a lot : RED GEM WOMAN – coz she could sit here all afternoon…Jul 3, 13:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Still rubbish, Main. Still not seeing any “the positive case for the Union”. Surely you don’t lack arguments. Do you…Jul 3, 13:16
    • James on The Con Merchant: “Ooft. I think you nailed it there, Lochinvar. A GOTCHA.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Read books. It will do you good.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““Professor Robert Black KC, FRSA, FRSE, FFCS, ILTM ( Professor Emeritus of Scots Law at the University of Edinburgh), was…Jul 3, 13:06
  • A tall tale



↑ Top