The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The blame game

Posted on May 14, 2010 by

We're almost done with the politics stuff, viewers. Normal WoSblog service will be resumed shortly, but first I thought I might as well share with you an email I received this morning.

Back on Monday, when uncertainty still ruled as to who'd be forming the next government, the website 38 Degrees invited its users to send emergency emails to Labour MPs, urging them not to block any potential "progressive alliance" by vowing to vote against electoral reform, as many threatened to.

I took up the site's call, but sent a rather less restrained mail than their suggested text, because I was so extraordinarily angry with the largely-Scottish Labour MPs whose cowardice and naked self-interest looked like scuppering the most revolutionary step forward in the history of British democracy (and ultimately did). I sent it to as many Labour members as I could click on.

 

"If any of you halfwits – particularly the idiots in Scotland blinded by deranged hatred of the SNP – screw this up and let the Tories in, you will NEVER, EVER be forgiven. Take your fat noses out of the trough and JUST ONCE act in the interests of the people of this country who've been stupid enough to vote for you thinking that you might do something useful in the rare moments between filing expenses claims, like bring about an electoral system in which more than 30% of people's votes count.

The alternative? Let the Tories gerrymander the boundaries so that none of you are ever in power again. If you don't have the courage to act in the interests of the country, at least try to protect your own pathetic, worthless necks by delivering PR that will keep the Tories out forever.

Otherwise, please crawl into a ditch and die."

 

My inbox soon filled with auto-replies, and after events played themselves out over the course of the week I didn't expect anyone to bother answering. So I was surprised to receive this this morning, from the Labour member for Wallasey, Angela Eagle MP. (Who Wikipedia, by way of local colour, tells me is Britain's only openly lesbian MP.)


"I am responding to your email about the result of the General Election, and the possibility of a "progressive alliance".

As a member of the Labour Party's NEC I can assure you that there was almost unanimous support for discussing a "progressive alliance" with the Liberal Democrats in order to prevent a Tory government, when we met on Tuesday.

However, it soon became apparent that the Liberal Democrats had no intention of reaching an agreement with us because of the unrealistic demands they were putting forward. Indeed it is now clear to me that their negotiations with Labour were nothing but a ploy to wring further concessions out of the Tories.

During the election campaign Clegg made clear he would work with the party that had the strongest support, which the polls clearly suggested would be the Tories. Furthermore, once the result of the election was known, Clegg again indicated his preference for an agreement with the Tories. Indeed the article below shows that Clegg wanted to do a deal with the Tories rather than Labour from day one of his leadership.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-513240/Lib-Con-pact-Clegg-offers-prop-Tory-government-Cameron-agrees-power-share-deal.html

I would have preferred any outcome other than letting the Tories back into government. It is clear to me that they are set to use the current economic circumstances as cover to do what they always do, slash services and cut spending. You only have to cast your mind back to Cameron and Osborne's speeches at the last Tory conference to see this, when they demanded an 'age of austerity' and railed against 'big government'.

The Parliamentary arithmetic meant that it was for the Liberal Democrats to determine the shape of the new government and they have sadly chosen to team up with the Tories. I expect you share my disappointment at this turn of events, disappointment that no doubt turns to bitterness for those who actually voted Liberal Democrat in the expectation of progressive politics.

Yours sincerely

Angela Eagle MP
Lab. Wallasey"


The email makes no mention of my frankly rude and aggressive conduct (although it does quote my original message in its entirety), so it seems likely that it's a form reply. But I'm at least impressed that she bothered to compose it and send it to people, including non-constituents like myself. It doesn't actually address the main issue, or set out her position on electoral reform, or explain what the Lib Dems' unreasonable demands were, but it's something.

I've emailed Ms Eagle back to see if I can extract some clarification on some of the things she mentions.  In the meantime, it'll be interesting to see if I hear from anyone else.

17 to “The blame game”

  1. FWIW, I got the exact same reply, and a similar argument from a couple of other MPs, who claimed the Lib's demands were ludicrous.
    Those that weren't spam/autoresponders (from the 22 responses I got) were:
    Blame the Lib Dems: Alison Seabeck ("if they sign up to the Tories [they] have, in my view, been conned"); Maria Eagle (identical to your reply)
    Taking the middle ground: Peter Soulsby ("I am not aware of any campaign by Labour MPs standing in the way of a coalition government. I can assure you that I am certainly not opposed to such an arrangement nor to electoral reform.")
    Supported the coalition/PR: Joan Ruddock (supported the then-current negotiations); Richard Burden (chairs the all-party group on electoral reform, hoped for a fairer system); Fabian Hamilton (supports AV+, open to progressive aims)

    Reply
  2. roBurky says:

    I have had that same reply from Angela, and also a very similar reply from her sister Maria Eagle.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Coo. I wonder how many pairs of siblings we have in Parliament, apart from the Eagles and the Milibands?

    Reply
  4. mister k says:

    Bah, they can blame the lib dems all they like, but there were significant Labour mps coming out and arguing against the coalition- I suspect the same mps who were opposed to electoral reform, and figured handing the tories the poisoned chalice of this economy and recovering in opposition was the best thing for the party. I read rumours that some of the ridiculous demands included things like scrapping id cards, as Labour in its current form apparently hates all civil liberties.

    Reply
  5. Peter St. John says:

    To be fair, Lord Adonis says the Labour team offered up cancelling ID Cards and the third runway to the Lib Dems – neither side is all that trustworthy in this affair, though!

    Reply
  6. CdrJameson says:

    I think this form reply rather confirms that you've been ignored, not listened to.

    And possibly added to a Labour party spam list too, you lucky devil.

    Reply
  7. Anonymous X says:

    I strongly suspect the Labour MPs who replied to Craig in favour of electoral reform are from the centre of the party. The left, and hard left, in particular are the most rigid supporters of keeping the rotten FPTP system, and without exaggeration see the LibDems as a Tory front organisation!

    Reply
  8. AJ says:

    The spin machine has gone into overdrive to rewrite history. Especially with the Scottish Labour and Scottish Liberal Democrats. The usual "Blame the SNP" tactic comes to the fore while the many Labour objectors are forgotten about and swept under the rug.

    Reply
  9. Angela Eagle says: As a member of the Labour Party's NEC I can assure you that there was almost unanimous support for discussing a "progressive alliance" with the Liberal Democrats in order to prevent a Tory government, when we met on Tuesday.
    However, it soon became apparent that the Liberal Democrats had no intention of reaching an agreement with us because of the unrealistic demands they were putting forward. Indeed it is now clear to me that their negotiations with Labour were nothing but a ploy to wring further concessions out of the Tories.
    During the election campaign Clegg made clear he would work with the party that had the strongest support, which the polls clearly suggested would be the Tories. Furthermore, once the result of the election was known, Clegg again indicated his preference for an agreement with the Tories. Indeed the article below shows that Clegg wanted to do a deal with the Tories rather than Labour from day one of his leadership.
    link to dailymail.co.uk
    I would have preferred any outcome other than letting the Tories back into government. It is clear to me that they are set to use the current economic circumstances as cover to do what they always do, slash services and cut spending. You only have to cast your mind back to Cameron and Osborne's speeches at the last Tory conference to see this, when they demanded an 'age of austerity' and railed against 'big government'.
    The Parliamentary arithmetic meant that it was for the Liberal Democrats to determine the shape of the new government and they have sadly chosen to team up with the Tories. I expect you share my disappointment at this turn of events, disappointment that no doubt turns to bitterness for those who actually voted Liberal Democrat in the expectation of progressive politics.

    Reply
  10. AJ says:

    Truly the Labour party, and in particular the Scottish Labour party, have no shame or sense of responsibility at all.

    Reply
  11. Tom Camfield says:

    The alternative interpretation (from The Telegraph):
    link to telegraph.co.uk
    Or, how about a blow by blow account, including what Labour were prepared to give and where it all went wrong:
    link to guardian.co.uk
    It seems likely that the Lib Dems were at fault, but in many ways Labour would be unlikely bedfellows, any rainbow coalition would have, maximum, a five seat majority, and it's not as if the Labour party have listened to their leader since Blair's first term. The whole thing would have been a poor gamble.
    Oddly enough, if implemented (big if) the Lib-Con plans do paint a reasonably Lib Dem picture, with civil liberties returned, reform of both Houses, poorer workers getting less tax while rich shareholders feel the sting… there's even talk of further devolution, pension increases and continued spending on the NHS. I mean, in 50 days we'll probably all be watching welfare applicants being flogged on the streets as part of the emergency budget, but if we're not, these policies aren't exactly terrible, are they?

    Reply
  12. bloodflowers says:

    "JUST ONCE act in the interests of the people of this country"

    Well – that would be nice.  However, this is the sort of thing Labour voters were really getting:
     
    link to timesonline.co.uk
    And that is precisely why the most important thing of all, was getting these corrupt bastards out.

    Reply
  13. Well, if it's in the Times, it must be a completely balanced and unbiased summary of the situation, and not, for instance, whatever press release from Conservative Central Office that Rupert Murdoch's told them to print in order to deflect blame for any unpopular economic policies and underwhelming future performance from the incoming government.  For instance.
    There's not much joy to be had in getting rid of one set of corrupt bastards and replacing them with an almost-identical set of corrupt bastards.

    Reply
  14. Paed says:

    FWIW, I got the exact same reply, and a similar argument from a couple of other MPs, who claimed the Lib's demands were ludicrous.Those that weren't spam/autoresponders (from the 22 responses I got) were:Blame the Lib Dems: Alison Seabeck ("if they sign up to the Tories [they] have, in my view, been conned"); Maria Eagle (identical to your reply)Taking the middle ground: Peter Soulsby ("I am not aware of any campaign by Labour MPs standing in the way of a coalition government. I can assure you that I am certainly not opposed to such an arrangement nor to electoral reform.")Supported the coalition/PR: Joan Ruddock (supported the then-current negotiations); Richard Burden (chairs the all-party group on electoral reform, hoped for a fairer system); Fabian Hamilton (supports AV+, open to progressive aims)
    +1

    Reply
  15. AJ says:

    "There's not much joy to be had in getting rid of one set of corrupt bastards and replacing them with an almost-identical set of corrupt bastards."
     
    Sums it up well, sadly.

    Reply
  16. Lian says:

    Brilliant reporting..

    Reply
  17. Lian says:

    I'm a Scottish news nerd

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,747 Posts, 1,216,798 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • carjamtic on The Takeover: “…….Will the slow white hearse of the child of Scotland follow them around ?Apr 29, 11:25
    • Garavelli Princip on The Takeover: “And of course, Pakistan is the very model of good governance and stability. Just what we need to import here.Apr 29, 11:07
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “Obviously we are always going to have a problem with whom sits dictating to the people in Scotland from the…Apr 29, 11:06
    • Oneliner on The Takeover: “I am reminded of submariner William McNeilly who blew the gaff on The Royal Navy’s disregard for the health and…Apr 29, 10:58
    • Dave Hansell on The Takeover: ““You might even agree with me that some cultures are better then [I suspect you mean than, rather than “then”]…Apr 29, 10:48
    • Hatey McHateface on The Takeover: “FFS Barbs. I provided three justifications for determining the rightful owners and occupiers of the land – Holy Writ, surviving…Apr 29, 10:35
    • Alf Baird on The Takeover: “Demographics as a determinant of (and barrier to) independence: https://yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com/2021/07/11/determinants-of-independence-demographics/Apr 29, 10:25
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “The excess immigration into Britain is Westminsters cause and problem.I was trying to imagine why Farage thinks it has anything…Apr 29, 10:19
    • Southernbystander on The Takeover: “Yeah but at least we ain’t a bunch of self-loathing, fat, fucked up heroin addicts, losers who were too pathetic…Apr 29, 10:14
    • Chas on The Takeover: “Reading some of the comments this morning, I can only assume it was a full moon last night! How come…Apr 29, 09:58
    • Molesworth on The Takeover: “The vipers are in the nest,Apr 29, 09:47
    • Willie on The Takeover: “You make interesting point Yoon scum about the Clyde and its hidden petroleum resources. The area down to around Arran…Apr 29, 09:39
    • Geri on The Takeover: “Lol at Fantasists. You believe a higher being gave them a promised land written by …..themselves. Phew! That was handy!…Apr 29, 09:08
    • Garavelli Princip on The Takeover: “This is truly dangerous stuff that needs called out. Well done Stuart Campbell. It has taken us hundreds of years…Apr 29, 08:53
    • Hatey McHateface on The Takeover: “Fit aboot yer mobile gas chambers, Confused? Fa dae they fit intae yer plans? Dinna forget Barbie’s looking forwards tae…Apr 29, 08:02
    • Dan on The Takeover: “Past article going down the rabbit hole of fairly representing Scotland. https://wingsoverscotland.com/representing-scotland/Apr 29, 07:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The Takeover: “Aye, Confused, it’s da Dews wot done it. Excepting the Japanese perhaps, there is probably no other group/religion/tribe/nation anywhere on…Apr 29, 07:48
    • Hatey McHateface on The Takeover: “They’re under your bed too, Barbie. Boo!!! I was going to write you’re gonna have to sleep standing up, but…Apr 29, 07:27
    • Yoon Scum on The Takeover: “I happily admit that I troll the moon howlers as they are funny if you aren’t a moron I’ll happily…Apr 29, 07:24
    • Yoon Scum on The Takeover: “Pay this NO voter £100K and I will leave scotland and NEVER returnApr 29, 07:18
    • Yoon Scum on The Takeover: “Geri You really can’t wait for britnat blood to be flowing down the streets can you You do know that…Apr 29, 06:50
    • Yoon Scum on The Takeover: “Seeing that Scotland has the worlds largest oil fields hidden in the river Clyde as English tech can’t steer submarines…Apr 29, 06:43
    • Yoon Scum on The Takeover: “If us English filth are in every country in the world How are you going to keep us out after…Apr 29, 06:40
    • Colin Dawson on The Takeover: “Whilst on the subject of over-represented groups in the Scottish Parliament, what proportion of MSPs are LGBTQ? There are currently…Apr 29, 04:41
    • Young Lochinvar on The Takeover: “As I already said; use the de-caff.. The strong coffee clearly isn’t agreeing with you.Apr 29, 03:31
    • twathater on The Takeover: “I think you’ve hit the nail firmly on the head, when you look at any documentaries on tv especially in…Apr 29, 03:22
    • twathater on The Takeover: “Could you envisage a group of white Christians standing in the midst of a town square in a large city…Apr 29, 03:07
    • Cynicus on The Takeover: ““Or, maybe they’ll just team up and kick lumps out of Bangladesh.. No idea why, who have the Banglis ever…Apr 29, 01:45
    • Geri on The Takeover: ““it’s monty don in the garden and nigella rubbing her arse on the aga” LMAO! Aye, so true. Said something…Apr 29, 01:28
    • Jason Smoothpiece on The Takeover: “The level of immigration causes me great concern I think a party which convinces me that it will reverse the…Apr 29, 00:30
  • A tall tale



↑ Top