The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The blame game

Posted on May 14, 2010 by

We're almost done with the politics stuff, viewers. Normal WoSblog service will be resumed shortly, but first I thought I might as well share with you an email I received this morning.

Back on Monday, when uncertainty still ruled as to who'd be forming the next government, the website 38 Degrees invited its users to send emergency emails to Labour MPs, urging them not to block any potential "progressive alliance" by vowing to vote against electoral reform, as many threatened to.

I took up the site's call, but sent a rather less restrained mail than their suggested text, because I was so extraordinarily angry with the largely-Scottish Labour MPs whose cowardice and naked self-interest looked like scuppering the most revolutionary step forward in the history of British democracy (and ultimately did). I sent it to as many Labour members as I could click on.

 

"If any of you halfwits – particularly the idiots in Scotland blinded by deranged hatred of the SNP – screw this up and let the Tories in, you will NEVER, EVER be forgiven. Take your fat noses out of the trough and JUST ONCE act in the interests of the people of this country who've been stupid enough to vote for you thinking that you might do something useful in the rare moments between filing expenses claims, like bring about an electoral system in which more than 30% of people's votes count.

The alternative? Let the Tories gerrymander the boundaries so that none of you are ever in power again. If you don't have the courage to act in the interests of the country, at least try to protect your own pathetic, worthless necks by delivering PR that will keep the Tories out forever.

Otherwise, please crawl into a ditch and die."

 

My inbox soon filled with auto-replies, and after events played themselves out over the course of the week I didn't expect anyone to bother answering. So I was surprised to receive this this morning, from the Labour member for Wallasey, Angela Eagle MP. (Who Wikipedia, by way of local colour, tells me is Britain's only openly lesbian MP.)


"I am responding to your email about the result of the General Election, and the possibility of a "progressive alliance".

As a member of the Labour Party's NEC I can assure you that there was almost unanimous support for discussing a "progressive alliance" with the Liberal Democrats in order to prevent a Tory government, when we met on Tuesday.

However, it soon became apparent that the Liberal Democrats had no intention of reaching an agreement with us because of the unrealistic demands they were putting forward. Indeed it is now clear to me that their negotiations with Labour were nothing but a ploy to wring further concessions out of the Tories.

During the election campaign Clegg made clear he would work with the party that had the strongest support, which the polls clearly suggested would be the Tories. Furthermore, once the result of the election was known, Clegg again indicated his preference for an agreement with the Tories. Indeed the article below shows that Clegg wanted to do a deal with the Tories rather than Labour from day one of his leadership.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-513240/Lib-Con-pact-Clegg-offers-prop-Tory-government-Cameron-agrees-power-share-deal.html

I would have preferred any outcome other than letting the Tories back into government. It is clear to me that they are set to use the current economic circumstances as cover to do what they always do, slash services and cut spending. You only have to cast your mind back to Cameron and Osborne's speeches at the last Tory conference to see this, when they demanded an 'age of austerity' and railed against 'big government'.

The Parliamentary arithmetic meant that it was for the Liberal Democrats to determine the shape of the new government and they have sadly chosen to team up with the Tories. I expect you share my disappointment at this turn of events, disappointment that no doubt turns to bitterness for those who actually voted Liberal Democrat in the expectation of progressive politics.

Yours sincerely

Angela Eagle MP
Lab. Wallasey"


The email makes no mention of my frankly rude and aggressive conduct (although it does quote my original message in its entirety), so it seems likely that it's a form reply. But I'm at least impressed that she bothered to compose it and send it to people, including non-constituents like myself. It doesn't actually address the main issue, or set out her position on electoral reform, or explain what the Lib Dems' unreasonable demands were, but it's something.

I've emailed Ms Eagle back to see if I can extract some clarification on some of the things she mentions.  In the meantime, it'll be interesting to see if I hear from anyone else.

17 to “The blame game”

  1. FWIW, I got the exact same reply, and a similar argument from a couple of other MPs, who claimed the Lib's demands were ludicrous.
    Those that weren't spam/autoresponders (from the 22 responses I got) were:
    Blame the Lib Dems: Alison Seabeck ("if they sign up to the Tories [they] have, in my view, been conned"); Maria Eagle (identical to your reply)
    Taking the middle ground: Peter Soulsby ("I am not aware of any campaign by Labour MPs standing in the way of a coalition government. I can assure you that I am certainly not opposed to such an arrangement nor to electoral reform.")
    Supported the coalition/PR: Joan Ruddock (supported the then-current negotiations); Richard Burden (chairs the all-party group on electoral reform, hoped for a fairer system); Fabian Hamilton (supports AV+, open to progressive aims)

    Reply
  2. roBurky says:

    I have had that same reply from Angela, and also a very similar reply from her sister Maria Eagle.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Coo. I wonder how many pairs of siblings we have in Parliament, apart from the Eagles and the Milibands?

    Reply
  4. mister k says:

    Bah, they can blame the lib dems all they like, but there were significant Labour mps coming out and arguing against the coalition- I suspect the same mps who were opposed to electoral reform, and figured handing the tories the poisoned chalice of this economy and recovering in opposition was the best thing for the party. I read rumours that some of the ridiculous demands included things like scrapping id cards, as Labour in its current form apparently hates all civil liberties.

    Reply
  5. Peter St. John says:

    To be fair, Lord Adonis says the Labour team offered up cancelling ID Cards and the third runway to the Lib Dems – neither side is all that trustworthy in this affair, though!

    Reply
  6. CdrJameson says:

    I think this form reply rather confirms that you've been ignored, not listened to.

    And possibly added to a Labour party spam list too, you lucky devil.

    Reply
  7. Anonymous X says:

    I strongly suspect the Labour MPs who replied to Craig in favour of electoral reform are from the centre of the party. The left, and hard left, in particular are the most rigid supporters of keeping the rotten FPTP system, and without exaggeration see the LibDems as a Tory front organisation!

    Reply
  8. AJ says:

    The spin machine has gone into overdrive to rewrite history. Especially with the Scottish Labour and Scottish Liberal Democrats. The usual "Blame the SNP" tactic comes to the fore while the many Labour objectors are forgotten about and swept under the rug.

    Reply
  9. Angela Eagle says: As a member of the Labour Party's NEC I can assure you that there was almost unanimous support for discussing a "progressive alliance" with the Liberal Democrats in order to prevent a Tory government, when we met on Tuesday.
    However, it soon became apparent that the Liberal Democrats had no intention of reaching an agreement with us because of the unrealistic demands they were putting forward. Indeed it is now clear to me that their negotiations with Labour were nothing but a ploy to wring further concessions out of the Tories.
    During the election campaign Clegg made clear he would work with the party that had the strongest support, which the polls clearly suggested would be the Tories. Furthermore, once the result of the election was known, Clegg again indicated his preference for an agreement with the Tories. Indeed the article below shows that Clegg wanted to do a deal with the Tories rather than Labour from day one of his leadership.
    link to dailymail.co.uk
    I would have preferred any outcome other than letting the Tories back into government. It is clear to me that they are set to use the current economic circumstances as cover to do what they always do, slash services and cut spending. You only have to cast your mind back to Cameron and Osborne's speeches at the last Tory conference to see this, when they demanded an 'age of austerity' and railed against 'big government'.
    The Parliamentary arithmetic meant that it was for the Liberal Democrats to determine the shape of the new government and they have sadly chosen to team up with the Tories. I expect you share my disappointment at this turn of events, disappointment that no doubt turns to bitterness for those who actually voted Liberal Democrat in the expectation of progressive politics.

    Reply
  10. AJ says:

    Truly the Labour party, and in particular the Scottish Labour party, have no shame or sense of responsibility at all.

    Reply
  11. Tom Camfield says:

    The alternative interpretation (from The Telegraph):
    link to telegraph.co.uk
    Or, how about a blow by blow account, including what Labour were prepared to give and where it all went wrong:
    link to guardian.co.uk
    It seems likely that the Lib Dems were at fault, but in many ways Labour would be unlikely bedfellows, any rainbow coalition would have, maximum, a five seat majority, and it's not as if the Labour party have listened to their leader since Blair's first term. The whole thing would have been a poor gamble.
    Oddly enough, if implemented (big if) the Lib-Con plans do paint a reasonably Lib Dem picture, with civil liberties returned, reform of both Houses, poorer workers getting less tax while rich shareholders feel the sting… there's even talk of further devolution, pension increases and continued spending on the NHS. I mean, in 50 days we'll probably all be watching welfare applicants being flogged on the streets as part of the emergency budget, but if we're not, these policies aren't exactly terrible, are they?

    Reply
  12. bloodflowers says:

    "JUST ONCE act in the interests of the people of this country"

    Well – that would be nice.  However, this is the sort of thing Labour voters were really getting:
     
    link to timesonline.co.uk
    And that is precisely why the most important thing of all, was getting these corrupt bastards out.

    Reply
  13. Well, if it's in the Times, it must be a completely balanced and unbiased summary of the situation, and not, for instance, whatever press release from Conservative Central Office that Rupert Murdoch's told them to print in order to deflect blame for any unpopular economic policies and underwhelming future performance from the incoming government.  For instance.
    There's not much joy to be had in getting rid of one set of corrupt bastards and replacing them with an almost-identical set of corrupt bastards.

    Reply
  14. Paed says:

    FWIW, I got the exact same reply, and a similar argument from a couple of other MPs, who claimed the Lib's demands were ludicrous.Those that weren't spam/autoresponders (from the 22 responses I got) were:Blame the Lib Dems: Alison Seabeck ("if they sign up to the Tories [they] have, in my view, been conned"); Maria Eagle (identical to your reply)Taking the middle ground: Peter Soulsby ("I am not aware of any campaign by Labour MPs standing in the way of a coalition government. I can assure you that I am certainly not opposed to such an arrangement nor to electoral reform.")Supported the coalition/PR: Joan Ruddock (supported the then-current negotiations); Richard Burden (chairs the all-party group on electoral reform, hoped for a fairer system); Fabian Hamilton (supports AV+, open to progressive aims)
    +1

    Reply
  15. AJ says:

    "There's not much joy to be had in getting rid of one set of corrupt bastards and replacing them with an almost-identical set of corrupt bastards."
     
    Sums it up well, sadly.

    Reply
  16. Lian says:

    Brilliant reporting..

    Reply
  17. Lian says:

    I'm a Scottish news nerd

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,726 Posts, 1,215,029 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Seems that neither Sven nor Bob have anything sensible to say about the war in the east. No change there…Apr 3, 19:26
    • Robert Hughes on The Gender Of Mountains: “Of course Swinney would bend over to * accommodate * the utterly farcical ” Red Menace ” bollocks ; another…Apr 3, 16:25
    • Sven on The Gender Of Mountains: “Vivian O’Blivion @ 14.15. A senior source close to the First Minister has a brass neck to dare to even…Apr 3, 16:12
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – there is no such thing as a binary state, states can either be unitary (like the U.K.) or…Apr 3, 15:02
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““there’ll be Ruskie tanks parked in front of Hollyrood if we’re no careful” That, my dear Vivian O’Blivion, is an…Apr 3, 14:59
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““gutless pro Trump Brit Yoon NAZI appeaser” Iain treats us to another lesson on “hearts and minds”. Just in case…Apr 3, 14:47
    • Young Lochinvar on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Khmer Vert should just pull the trigger of the metaphorical gun they are holding to their own “electability” heads…Apr 3, 14:20
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Scotland Editor of The New Statesman, Chris Deerin is full of praise for Mayor Swinney of Brigadoom. “The SNP…Apr 3, 14:15
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Yes – the ICCPR is an international obligation, however. For more information about the strength of the petition see Leah…Apr 3, 14:12
    • Dunx on The Gender Of Mountains: “The HRC And the ICCPR are different things.Apr 3, 12:54
    • MaryB on The Gender Of Mountains: “Thanks for that, Sarah.Apr 3, 12:16
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “As for the “principle of respect for the territorial integrity of states”, that can only apply to unitary states. For…Apr 3, 11:48
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Scotland Act 1998 clause 7 (2) Sub-paragraph (1) does NOT reserve – (a) observing and implementing international obligations, obligations under…Apr 3, 11:30
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “Ah, so it’s not an important matter of principle at all, then. It’s just a shoddy excuse to keep certain…Apr 3, 11:28
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: ““A gutless pro Trump British yoon Nazi appeaser” as opposed to an aborted pro Faggot inbred Lefty jizz stain.Apr 3, 10:24
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “@Mary – you’re right, but the UNCRC was successfully challenged in the Supreme Court on the basis that it extended…Apr 3, 10:04
    • Sven on The Gender Of Mountains: “Iain More @ 08.15. I suspect that this will be in retaliation for the 82% Tariff which the Islands impose…Apr 3, 09:49
    • Southernbystander on The Gender Of Mountains: “Is there not a serious problem of throwing the baby out with the bath water with this endless invocation of…Apr 3, 09:44
    • MaryB on The Gender Of Mountains: “Aidan @ 6.23am Why don’t you Google UN Human Rights and ICCPR? The UK adopted the overall Human Rights Act,…Apr 3, 09:36
    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “Ok we get that you are a gutless pro Trump Brit Yoon NAZI appeaser. Thanks for letting is know.Apr 3, 09:22
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Why is this a gift for Scottish Indy, Iain? Is iScotland going to stand up to President Trump and the…Apr 3, 08:48
    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “41% Tariffs on Falkland Islands. What did they do to piss off Fuhrer Trump? I had no idea that the…Apr 3, 08:15
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another cunning plan based on a whole heap of made up legal arguments which no court, anywhere, is going to…Apr 3, 06:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “@Zimba Regarding moral inconsistencies. I believe a meaningful debate between fair-minded individuals acting in good faith first needs some kind…Apr 2, 21:17
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “IMPORTANT: Leah Gunn Barrett attended the Public Petitions Committee at Holyrood today in order to see what would happen to…Apr 2, 19:40
    • agent x on The Gender Of Mountains: “Caroline Lucas says: “He helped transform the fortunes of the Scottish Green party – taking the party into government for…Apr 2, 18:13
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Have a wee look at her post and highlights of committee meeting today at Holyrood today, she’s a fighter, well…Apr 2, 18:08
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:04
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:00
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Soz, double post…Apr 2, 17:41
  • A tall tale



↑ Top