The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Svelte And Morons

Posted on January 04, 2010 by

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that a person's view on Love And Monsters is the single most telling indicator of their personality – specifically, the personality aspect of whether they're a soulless cretin or not.

L&M is by most measures the oddest episode of Doctor Who since the show's reinvention in 2005. Written by series producer Russell T Davies, it's an episode in which he appears to deliberately burden himself with as many handicaps as possible.

For a start, the Doctor and Rose barely appear in the episode at all – their presence is limited to the first three minutes (and that in a silly slapstick sequence) and parts of the last seven. The main baddy is Peter Kay, playing an alien designed by a nine-year-old child (actually literally) for a Blue Peter competition. A major element of the plot is the music of ELO, probably the least cool band in all of human existence. And to cap it all, the primary familiar character is Rose's mum.

Yet despite all these self-imposed millstones, Davies turns in a beautiful and polished episode that's not only arguably his own best in the series, but one of the most brave and subversive things ever delivered to a mainstream family audience on primetime Saturday-night TV.

His reward was a reception from Who fanboys and assorted other dolts that stopped just short of demanding that he be tarred, feathered, hung, drawn, quartered and have his remains fed to wild dogs.

It may be that the self-styled "Whovians" see a little too much of themselves in the nerdy characters of LINDA, which the episode mocks with the greatest and gentlest affection. (I suspect Davies is also poking fun at a part of himself in Elton's hammy theatrics.) Or it may just be that the people who bitterly attack L&M are simply ignorant twats incapable of grasping anything that isn't spoonfed to them along with giant signposts telling them what to think.

(The latter view tends to be supported by the surrounding evidence, such as the same people's tendency to select episodes like Steven Moffat's "Blink" and Paul Cornell's "The Family Of Blood" as the series' high points. Like, duh – you'd have to be really epically stupid not to notice that those were fantastic. And it's not as if you have to be a professor of rocket surgery to appreciate the only-slightly-more-nuanced brilliance of "Love And Monsters". You just have to not be a wanker.)

Though liberally scattered with childish humour like the aforementioned slapstick sequence (which I should note I enjoyed), L&M is also one of the most adult episodes of New Who, and not because of the blow-job joke at the end. Perhaps the reason is that as well as barely featuring the Doctor, it's not even really about him, and that frees Davies up to step slightly away from the Doc's rather black-and-white cowboys-and-indians world of the good Doctor and his charismatic-evil-genius adversaries.

Kay's cartoon-villain Abzorbaloff isn't sophisticated or dashing or clever – in fact it's a bit of an idiot, but it's no less lethal for that. Similarly, the good guys in the story aren't the heroic autistic savants the Doc usually manages to stumble across – they're awkward, geeky misfits with useless talents, limited social skills and terminally uncool taste, but they're portrayed with more depth than the one-dimensional characters that normally comprise the Doctor's supporting cast.

(And what's more, the ones killed by the Abzorbaloff – with one partial and disturbing exception – actually stay dead, something that Davies has barely been able to bring himself to do during his four years in charge of the series. Even the great Steven Moffat fell foul of the same tendency to cop out horribly over death, resurrecting almost everyone at the end of the otherwise-superb "Forest Of The Dead" story and thereby wrecking much of the hard-earned emotional impact of the preceding 90 minutes.)

Even Jackie Tyler, who usually appears chiefly as fuel for Davies' curious obsession with pantomime-stupid and awful mothers, is depicted as a much more convincing, vulnerable and likeable human being in this story.

(Seriously, though – has nobody else noticed this? Rose's mum, Martha's mum and Donna's mum are all portrayed as contemptible, neurotic dimwits right through RTD's Who. Compare and contrast these hateful harridans with the various assistants' dads, who are smart, perceptive and brave. Working through some issues, Russell?)

The heart of the story unfolds at a measured pace, made all the more affecting by the way the main protagonists don't notice what's happening until almost the end. Their unconventionally happy little group is torn apart inch-by-inch, and even the arrival of the Doctor only brings a token salvation.

The clever and bittersweet ending shows Elton's memory already starting to paper over the traumas he's been through, before he delivers the episode's subtly but powerfully subversive message (this is a show largely aimed at children, remember):

"When you're a kid, they tell you it's all 'Grow up, get a job, get married, get a house, have a kid' and that's it. But the truth is the world is so much stranger than that. It's so much darker. And so much madder. And so much better."

If those things do happen to represent your ultimate goals in life (or if you're just a hardcore fanboy sulking about the Doctor's peripheral role) then perhaps you won't like "Love And Monsters". But it represents Davies' lightest and nimblest writing throughout his tenure at the Who helm, and its understated restraint, unusually tight plotting and deft emotional balance deserve at least as much respect as his better-received, more obvious episodes like "Turn Left" and "Midnight".

Unless you're a cunt.

Not you, Elton. You're worth a hundred of them.

0 to “Svelte And Morons”

  1. Marlon says:

    EXACTLY this. L&M is truly wonderful.

    Reply
  2. Joe Larson says:

    I love Dr. Who but I’m hardly a fanboy. I’ve never discussed the show ad nauseum on an online forum, never delved into the who’s and whys of an episode. I just watch them. So I had never heard of L&M’s self imposed limitations before this, that the monster had been created by a child. I did notice the distinct absence of the Doctor and Rose. What I did see was what you mentioned, the slap stick humor and uncoordinated and uncomfortable-in-their-own-skin performances of the LINDA group, and I did not like the episode. I pretty much decided that I’d never go back and rewatch that one again after I saw it.

    What I’m saying is that maybe if you dig into the episode under the surface it’s brilliant and so fanboys _should_ love this one, but it fails on the casual viewer level, and that is a very bad place to fail.

    Just admit it. L&M wasn’t that good. RTD tried something and fell flat on his face in the process. It happens.

    For the record, I LOVED Blink and Family of Blood wasn’t bad at all.

    Reply
  3. botherer says:

    Don’t worry Joe, you’re right – it was a giant stinking pile of plop. Stu’s brain was replaced by a blancmange after he lost an unwise bet, and the results haven’t been pretty.

    Reply
  4. RevStu says:

    I think you’re thinking of YOUR MUM.

    Reply
  5. Joe Larson says:

    I should have added, I’m just throwing out a counter point. That’s all just my opinion. I really didn’t like the episode and if you’re going to accuse me of being an “ignorant twats incapable of grasping anything that isn’t spoon fed to them along with giant signposts telling them what to think” just because I don’t like this one episode, you’d better expect some defense of the position.

    I also didn’t realize this was as old a post as it is. Oddbob linked me to it on Twitter.

    Reply
  6. Joe Larson says:

    Wait a minute. Nevermind that last line. Why did I think this was an old blog post?

    Reply
  7. RevStu says:

    Because you’re an ignorant twat incapable of grasping – nah, only kidding. You don’t have to issue disclaimers on WoSblog, Joe. We’re all grownups here, and “it’s just my opinion” is taken as a given on all non-empirical facts. Don’t let a little bit of knockabout polemic get you bent out of shape.

    Reply
  8. Joe Larson says:

    Well, the “I think you’re thinking of YOUR MUM” comment above had me almost responding “No, I’m thinking of YOUR Mum. Mmm.” So I steered away from it.

    Reply
  9. Nervous Pete says:

    Stu’s entirely right. This episode is one of the best RTD’s written. It was such a breath of fresh air as well. When the Doctor’s there, despite the occasional excellence of adventures, you never really feel threatened. It’s like when you’re a kid your dad or mum are there and they can fix ANYTHING. But in Love & Monsters, mum and dad aren’t there – and there’s something really horrible out there.

    The Doctor can’t be everywhere. There are bad things out there in the world. Things you can’t deal with. You have to hope you survive and deal with the trauma after. Not that this is a bleak episode, the affirmation comes in how Elton copes. (And I’m not talking about through blow jobs) And how, before the horror comes, how the members of Linda find each other and make sense of their lives through each other. It’s the monster’s destruction of this that is particularly cruel, these people aren’t the usual ‘tragic’ cannon-fodder of a Who story.

    And it was very nice seeing how the Doctor deforms the world. Seeing Linda was worth a lot more than countless “HUMANITY! BRILLIANT!” speeches by Tennant later, proving that one should always be shown rather than told.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,603 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “OT. But, why are we using American corporates as consultants for road infrastructure around fort William? Aren’t there any Scottish…Jul 8, 10:27
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “Again, there is no point in trying to rewrite history here. Go back and read the posts prior to May…Jul 8, 10:25
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “No, Aidan, that was not the plan. I had misunderstood part of it because I was unaware at the time…Jul 8, 09:38
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Alf – does Edinburgh not have one of the highest rates of GDP per capita anywhere in the world, higher…Jul 8, 08:58
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Gaun yersel Aidan, tell us aw aboot oor zero-growth unner-developed and plunnerred colonial economy aye rin bi a bunch o…Jul 8, 07:40
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “Let’s rewind back a bit, go back to any WoS post from May or earlier and the plan was very…Jul 8, 06:18
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Dangerous stuff. The more boxes that are ticked that say “ye just Cannae dae it” and that we are in…Jul 8, 05:07
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “Brilliant!Jul 8, 01:33
    • Dunx on Too Tight To Mention: “The UK has a veto in the UN Security Council, not the General Assembly . The GA is a talking…Jul 8, 00:41
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “I suspect not MB. The problem I have with the Jacobite rebellions is the whole “using” thing the exiled Stuart’s…Jul 8, 00:24
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “LOLz 🙂Jul 7, 23:57
    • Stuart on Too Tight To Mention: “Would that be the same UN General Assembly where the UK Government can wield a veto? Why yes it is!…Jul 7, 23:21
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “Only one page on JPTI appears relevant, Aidan, and it doesn’t say what you asserted. JPTI states on its site…Jul 7, 22:52
    • sarah on Too Tight To Mention: “Liberation’s case has to be approved by the General Assembly of the UN. That is well known. The route to…Jul 7, 22:28
    • Oneliner on Too Tight To Mention: “Not My KingJul 7, 22:27
    • Confused on Too Tight To Mention: “I like to think of it this way : an analogy Scotland is like Auschwitz (rich industrial area, but not…Jul 7, 22:10
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: ““The foundational function of the State is the monopolistic organization of the power of the sword over a territorial cultural…Jul 7, 22:07
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “I quite agree, “Chas” is indeed a unionist prick. Well said.Jul 7, 21:56
    • Northcode on Too Tight To Mention: “Leah Gunn Barrett has this to say about the Darien Scheme. The Darien Myth and the Origins of the Union…Jul 7, 21:53
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “Pity the Jacobites didn’t win. Young English nationalists would be talking of the slaughter of London, the burning of Winchester.…Jul 7, 21:46
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Alf – I constantly praise Scotland and talk up its strengths both here and in person. Can the same be…Jul 7, 21:37
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Xaracen – it’s on the JPTI website. If you want the actual wording you’ll need to email JPTI or persuade…Jul 7, 21:35
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: ““they talk about our history and culture as being ancient guff but not one of them has ever presented anything…Jul 7, 21:19
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““The Committee on Decolonisation has said conclusively that the case of Scotland won’t even be considered in any session as…Jul 7, 21:14
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Chas Well first because it’s interesting, second because it’s pertinent to much of the discussion going on here and lastly…Jul 7, 21:12
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “No it doesn’tJul 7, 20:59
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “Looking forward to hearing about it Sarah.Jul 7, 20:55
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “Why? The past has passed.Jul 7, 20:55
    • sarah on Too Tight To Mention: “Liberation’s case to the UN continues.Jul 7, 20:43
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “I reckon with the current thread toing and froing on the subject of colonies and colonialism and the Act of…Jul 7, 20:42
  • A tall tale



↑ Top