The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Question Of The Week

Posted on January 11, 2012 by

Tonight's edition of Newsnight Scotland featured duelling lawyers, with conflicting views on the legality of the Scottish Government's proposed referendum. Professor Adam Tomkins from the University of Glasgow put forward the opinion that Holyrood basically had no power to do anything at all and should be grateful for Westminster's "very generous" offer to help out, while Professor Stephen Tierney (University of Edinburgh) posited the interpretation that an advisory referendum was perfectly fine as it didn't in itself lead to legislation and therefore exceed the Parliament's competence.

Presenter Raymond Buchanan tried to navigate the tricky constitutional minefield between the two, and after Prof. Tierney had given his explanation of why the referendum bill might be lawful, Buchanan stabbed right at the heart of the dilemma when he asked the question viewers across the nation were shouting at their screens:

"Just to clarify that: so, so, if there was a Yes vote, which said "Go and negotiate with Westminster" and then, uh… then Westminster… or the… what you're saying whether the voters rejected that then, what would happen or… Westminster rejected it, what impact would you, were you saying?"

Well and truly clarified, we'd say. It was a feat of no small magnitude that the Daily Record's Torcuil Crichton actually managed to haul the intellectual level down a couple of notches from there later in the show, but that's another story. The important thing is that the future of the independence debate is in safe hands!

5 to “Question Of The Week”

  1. molly says:

    Sorry guys,the presenter was Raymond Buchanan. Gary Robertson is on GMS in the mornings.Possibly at home now reading "how not to conduct an informative interview"-its all about meeee,its allabout me….its all……

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    How embarrassing – I always muddle those two up. It's been a long day, corrected now. Cheers for the heads-up.

    Reply
  3. peter says:

    if the referendum ballot paper is a straight  yes/no to independence and the result being, no. will all political parties (mibbee no torys) go into the 2016 scottish election, on a maifesto  that champons dev max?

    Reply
  4. Morag says:

    In your dreams.

    Reply
  5. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    No. A defeat for independence will kill devo max for a generation, just like the AV referendum killed PR.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,251 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?” That almost no one agrees with your analysis of the situation? It’s…Jul 3, 17:19
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Andrew Scott, Its simply a matter of scrolling on by if you are not interested in realising that Westminsters governance…Jul 3, 16:29
    • 100%Yes on Too Tight To Mention: “The big question is, how is the SNP still alive and kicking. I do not believe for a minute the…Jul 3, 15:34
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Indeed, «hiding»in plain sight and all perfectly normal in Yookay.. It seems the British state functions on the accommodating body…Jul 3, 15:17
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: “And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?Jul 3, 15:02
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “Again we keep coming to this issue of the preservation of sovereignty. In the context you mean it, sovereignty means…Jul 3, 14:52
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: “Semantics, at the end of the day. The substantive point still stands, whether or not you think you’ve answered Aiden’s…Jul 3, 14:42
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: ““Ah, a classic case of hinging an entire argument off a single, extreme outlier argument” Maybe it escaped your attention,…Jul 3, 14:31
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “I think it’s about time we looked seriously at these Trade Union representatives. 1. They don’t understand the Law. 2.…Jul 3, 14:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “this is why I miss, such a lot : RED GEM WOMAN – coz she could sit here all afternoon…Jul 3, 13:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Still rubbish, Main. Still not seeing any “the positive case for the Union”. Surely you don’t lack arguments. Do you…Jul 3, 13:16
    • James on The Con Merchant: “Ooft. I think you nailed it there, Lochinvar. A GOTCHA.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Read books. It will do you good.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““Professor Robert Black KC, FRSA, FRSE, FFCS, ILTM ( Professor Emeritus of Scots Law at the University of Edinburgh), was…Jul 3, 13:06
    • Andrew scott on Too Tight To Mention: “@cheyne Your contributions adds what to the debate as to the devious Murrell getting taxpayers money to fight his case?????Jul 3, 13:03
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: “So what, Aidan? The procedures of the two houses of the parliament of England were indeed known in 1707, but…Jul 3, 12:42
    • McDuff on Too Tight To Mention: “The initial complaint was about the missing £600,000 yet no information regarding its whereabouts has been forthcoming. Why? It’s either…Jul 3, 12:36
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “For Sale Time machine. Si 2000xL Mark II One careful owner. Six months tax and MOTed. 100,000 light years on…Jul 3, 12:29
    • Ste fella on Too Tight To Mention: “Posted on scotgoespop today on his joy at krap alba polling article at 12:”4 030725: “Wishing the demise of a…Jul 3, 12:25
    • lothianlad on Too Tight To Mention: “SNP have been infiltrated by the british security services for years. Bribery and blackmail are their weapons. discrediting the snp…Jul 3, 12:07
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Salvo need to include such information in their presentations should the requirement arise as evidence that the Scots are a…Jul 3, 11:13
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Westminster governance of Great Britain is under the governance of Englands law. To all intents and purposes. This can be…Jul 3, 10:57
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “So the devolved parliament sent to Scotland. Is it under the governing body of english law? The governing body of…Jul 3, 10:42
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “TURABDIN. Aside from the obvious hidden traciblity of ownership. The interesting part of that information that may go unnoticed is…Jul 3, 10:33
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “You are arguing with me separately about the impact of English people moving to Scotland and now you’re telling us…Jul 3, 10:20
    • James Cheyne on The Con Merchant: “A slight change in conversation. It is interesting to note that ulster Scots are recognised as a minority. For funding.…Jul 3, 10:06
    • James Cheyne on The Con Merchant: “Commentry is once again being delayed.Jul 3, 09:48
    • James Cheyne on The Con Merchant: “He also states there is no such identity as the UK,Jul 3, 09:45
    • James Cheyne on The Art Of Noise: “The above comments came from Carwyn Jones, former first minister of Wales.Jul 3, 09:36
    • James Cheyne on The Con Merchant: “English principle of sovereignty of parliament. There is nothing in Statue,Law that defines parliamentary Sovereignty. There is no legislation that…Jul 3, 09:20
  • A tall tale



↑ Top