The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Six rules football should copy from rugby

Posted on March 07, 2010 by

With a tremendous sense of comic timing, the International Football Association Board this week ruled (despite the votes of the English and Scottish FAs) against any possibility of even experimenting with the use of goal-line technology, almost at the same minute as Birmingham City were denied a clear goal in their FA Cup quarter-final against Portsmouth that might have kept them in the competition.

It’s embarrassing that in the modern age such crucial refereeing errors, so simple to rectify, can still see teams knocked out of a nation’s biggest cup tournament. What’s more embarrassing still is that another sport has successfully demonstrated just how easily many of the niggling issues that dog the thankless task of football officiating can be solved.

1. Video replays.

There is simply no rational argument against the introduction of video replays, which work extremely well in rugby, tennis, cricket and other sports. They don’t “break up the game” – when refs call for the TMO in rugby, it just adds to the tension and excitement, especially in grounds with video screens where the crowd can see the replay too, and it wastes no more time than having a crowd of players surrounding the referee and fruitlessly protesting, which is what happens now.

(Often, the current situation results in a double injustice, as team that’s just had a penalty wrongly awarded against them or a goal wrongly allowed or disallowed also suffers one or more yellow cards for complaining about it.)

Replays would also be entirely at the discretion of the referee, when he wasn’t absolutely sure that the evidence of his own eyes was satisfactory. They could be restricted to goals only, or also allowed for penalty kicks, or sending-off decisions, even offsides (in conjunction with an amended advantage rule – see below).

2. Proper application of the advantage rule.

Having spotted a foul, rugby refs can allow the game to go on for sometimes as long as a minute to see if the attacking team can gain any advantage from the situation. If not, it’s back for the free kick. In football, the allowable period of advantage seems to be approximately half a second.

As such, it’s almost impossible for the ref to properly judge whether an advantage has resulted or not, leading almost always to the attacking team being penalised. (Either by being denied the chance to carry on and score, or by the fouler getting away with it.)

This is clearly wrong, and needlessly so. Football is a faster-moving game than rugby and couldn’t have such a long period of advantage, but surely attackers could be allowed, say, five seconds to make the most of any opportunities before being hauled back for the free kick?

3. The 10-yard dissent rule.

What happened to this? For about a fortnight a few years ago, haranguing a football ref about a free kick risked resulting in it being moved forward 10 yards, as in rugby. I don’t remember hearing any announcement about this rule being rescinded, but it never happens any more. Bring it back.

4. Mic up referees.

Related to (3), and an important step towards a general policy of much greater respect for refs, as seen in the egg-chasing game. If gigantic hulking prop forwards can quietly say “Yes sir” to a tiny wee ref when he tells them to shut up, so can overpaid prima-donna footballers.

Watching the ref get crowded and bullied sends out all sorts of bad signals, and never achieves anything anyway. Miking football referees would probably lead to a few X-rated moments in the first weeks, but sooner or later players would learn to accept the ref’s decision or get booked, no messing around.

And of course, with video replays for contentious major decisions, there’d be less need for shouting at the ref in the first place.

5. Proper clock management.

It’s ridiculous that this doesn’t happen already. Incredibly simple to implement, and would completely put an end to both time-wasting and added-time controversy (and the endless tired jokes about how much there’s going to be if Man Utd are trailing after 90 minutes). If the ref is stopping time for a substitution/injury/timewasting, he says “Time off” to the timekeeper and the clock stops.

Then, when the clock says “90”, time really is up, everyone in the ground can see it, and there’s no arguing over how much has been added. And you also don’t get the farcical situations where there have clearly been five or six minutes of stoppages, but the ref just adds the standard three.

6. The sin bin.

At the moment, defenders can make a cynical “professional foul” on an attacker (particularly late on in a game), prevent a goal being scored, and effectively escape any meaningful punishment, except maybe the possibility of being suspended for a later game against an entirely different team.

That’s clearly no compensation to the team who’ve just been denied a goalscoring opportunity (and in the case of “true” professional fouls, which don’t result in the award of a penalty kick, ACTUALLY denied one). Their team spending 10 minutes a man short gives a clear and meaningful punishment to the cheats, and two yellows would still mean a red.

Taken together, these simple and easily-implemented steps would mean a better, fairer, more transparent and more uplifting sport. None of them has any meaningful downside, and none of them has any significant financial cost. You know it makes sense.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marlon

This is just teeth-gnashingly pathetic. Cheats never prosper, huh? If fucking FOOTBALL they do.

Irish Al

Did you catch that guy, presumably the UK representative, justifying the decision? Along the lines of "oh well all these contested decisions spark great discussions in the pubs and we wouldn't want to lose that."
Something else that causes great discussions in pubs is failing to get to World Cup finals because cheating twats called Thierry Henry can get away with it.

John X

As has been made clear, I know nothing about football. And yet even I stare in open-mouthed confusion that "stoppage time" doesn't involve, um, time being stopped. I can see no rationale for not doing this (even high school teams in America can manage this feat for their sports), other than wishing to maintain the culture of corrupt decisions.
 
There. I had an opinion on football.

Paul R

In any real sport such an obvious mis-call by a referee would be addressed by a no-disqualifications Tables, Ladders and Chairs re-match the following Monday.
R- right?

Marlon

Um…I don't mean the article is pathetic, I mean that it's pathetic that none of these rules currently exist/are implemented in the game. I clearly should have had more coffee before posting.
And the fact that Goal-line technology has been dismissed is just…arrgh.

Tommy

I see your point about the sin bin, but I think it would be very hard to regulate.
It's bad enough in football right now when players see a controversial straight red. Slap a sin bin in there and that's an extra option the ref needs to consider for the player. Also, the flow of play in football is a lot less stop-starty, so having to wait an extra couple of minutes (including protests I imagine) would really slow it down. With your additional rule about the added time, it would really anger fans.
Don't get me wrong, I love going to rugby games, but they are far too different.
I do however fully agree with the video rule. Football desperately needs it. 


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,673 Posts, 1,203,343 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Mark Beggan on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Nightmare Images. Number 14. Kezia eating her cornflakes.Nov 26, 23:55
    • Young Lochinvar on A Personal Best For Kezia: “So having enjoyed reading all the comments to date (ok most) I take it the consensus is that midwitch cuckoo…Nov 26, 23:40
    • Campbell Clansman on A Personal Best For Kezia: “See, for example, how Scots will be worse off under Indy, at: https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/19059435.people-2-800-year-worse-off-independent-scotland-claims-new-research/ I include more links making this point,…Nov 26, 23:30
    • Campbell Clansman on A Personal Best For Kezia: “For more on how Scotland is better off in the UK, see https://www.economicsobservatory.com/an-independent-scotland-what-would-be-the-options-for-economic-success Or see https://www.gov.uk/government/news/why-scotland-is-better-off-as-part-of-the-uk Or this https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1231&context=sigma Of…Nov 26, 23:23
    • Garavelli Princip on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Agreed. Most- maybe all – of the posters on here who show negative (red) numbers are Yoon trolls – given…Nov 26, 22:59
    • James on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Can’t answer the question, huh?Nov 26, 22:40
    • Campbell Clansman on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Glad to see you can’t (and won’t) dispute that 1% Alba is dying in the water. Perhaps you’d also want…Nov 26, 22:38
    • Mia on A Personal Best For Kezia: ““If it’s all about control of U’s vast mineral resources, why are you so keen for R to get that…Nov 26, 22:32
    • Hatey McHateface on A Personal Best For Kezia: “That’ll be the Cuban missile crisis of 62 years ago. Bordering on the Ancient Guff in other words. James works…Nov 26, 22:31
    • Hatey McHateface on A Personal Best For Kezia: “FFS, how many times? Any Scot can enjoy the priceless benefit of going to live in Bath. So that’s one…Nov 26, 22:18
    • James on A Personal Best For Kezia: “As expected. He/she/it doesn’t have an answer. (because obviously there are no benefits for Scotland in the ‘union’).Nov 26, 22:10
    • James on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Oh, and the Americans, for their part were ready to push the button because….a foreign power dared to site nukes…Nov 26, 22:02
    • James on A Personal Best For Kezia: “He resisted the submarine commander. But keep it through the looking glass, that’s how you like it.Nov 26, 21:59
    • Oneliner on A Personal Best For Kezia: “That’s part of his training. Don’t engage with the enemy when you know you’ll take a pounding.Nov 26, 21:47
    • Hatey McHateface on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Shant! Mia’s shattered ma shaky self-esteem and shoogly self-confidence. Oh, all right then. First rule of courtesy for dealing with…Nov 26, 21:26
    • znovak on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Um, submariner Arkhipov saved the world by resisting his superiors, who wanted to release the nukes. So he saved the…Nov 26, 21:23
    • Alf Baird on A Personal Best For Kezia: ““North Britain” is rather like saying ‘North America’, or ‘North Asia’; it might be a geographic area but it is…Nov 26, 21:10
    • Michael Laing on A Personal Best For Kezia: “It’s your beloved United Kingdom that’s circling the plug-hole. And no wonder. No matter how often you’re asked to do…Nov 26, 21:04
    • Hatey McHateface on A Personal Best For Kezia: “//https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/BOTcharmer/ public class WingsBTLContainer {    public static void WhereIsIt()    {        System.Console.WriteLine(“As long as you never leave scotland, Ros, you’ll be…Nov 26, 21:03
    • Shug on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Labour in scotland would not and will not be allowed to have a coalition with the snp. Conservatives yes, green…Nov 26, 21:02
    • Michael Laing on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Come on then, Faceache, we’re all ears! Tell us how being in the UK benefits Scotland. Don’t tell me you’ve…Nov 26, 20:59
    • Hatey McHateface on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Insult your intelligence? Think about it. How could I make a start on doing that? If it’s all about control…Nov 26, 20:53
    • Mia on A Personal Best For Kezia: “I have come across this interesting article in internet:”The Pedantic Critic: New study looks at the motive behind nitpicking other…Nov 26, 20:47
    • Robert Matthews on A Personal Best For Kezia: “scotland(North Britain) is in the UK, so yes, calls go to a UK call centre.Nov 26, 20:38
    • Muscleguy on A Personal Best For Kezia: “John Hannah of ISP gained 8.75% of the vote coming 4th in the Tamworth by election a few months ago.…Nov 26, 20:34
    • Michael Laing on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Howsabout you explain to us how Scotland benefits from being in the UK instead of making pathetic comments about other…Nov 26, 19:59
    • Sven on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Police Scotland Call Service Centres are listed as being in Glasgow, Motherwell & Edinburgh.Nov 26, 19:53
    • Campbell Clansman on A Personal Best For Kezia: “There’s 4 more council by-elections in Scotland this year. Alba (the “true Indy Party” according to some here) can’t find…Nov 26, 19:48
    • Republicofscotland on A Personal Best For Kezia: “You would’ve thought that Scotland’s Police Force would have its own separate number. Of course Police Scotland was formed in…Nov 26, 19:47
    • Republicofscotland on A Personal Best For Kezia: “Mia – I think you might be replying to an AI Bot there in use now – and are quite…Nov 26, 19:38
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
125
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x