The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Quoted for truth #4

Posted on January 18, 2013 by

Joyce McMillan in the Scotsman today, as the Scottish press is finally, after three days, shamed into acknowledging what happened on Tuesday.

“What I see at Westminster now is not an alternative politics that avoids the pitfalls of nationalism, but an instinctive, backward-looking British nationalism that is even worse: a farrago of double standards about Westminster and Holyrood, and of reactionary nonsense about the nature of national identity in the 21st century, combined with a complete vacuum of progressive policy, and an instinctive willingness – on the part of the Labour Party – to side in this debate with what is perhaps the most privileged and reactionary government the UK has seen in a century.

The truth is that the tone of the No camp’s response to the independence debate has – in too many cases – been so reactionary, so negative, and so fundamentally disrespectful of the Scottish Parliament as an institution, that I now find it hard to think of voting with them, no matter what my views on the constitution.

And this, for me, is a new experience in politics – to enter a debate with a strongish view on one side of the argument, and to find myself so repelled by the tone and attitudes of those who should be my allies that I am gradually forced into the other camp.”

We’ll have more on that subject later this morning. Don’t miss it.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

46 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
blunttrauma

Read that this morning, I think the negativity of the NO campaign is bringing a lot of people into the YES camp.

Stevie Cosmic

This struck me as no more than a grudging acceptance of the merits of independence; ‘well, Westminster’s worse’. I see no enthusiasm for the myriad of benefits in independence to the Scottish people in this argument.
 
The positive vision for an independent Scotland, and an addressing of the democratic deficit, is what has driven the movement, not ‘how bad’ Westminster is or is not.

Seasick Dave

“Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer, and, without sneering, teach the rest to sneer.”

Alexander Pope 

Tris

It seemed obvious to me when the latest poll showed no increase in in YES voters, but a decrease in NO voters and a subsequent increase in DON’T KNOWS, that the NO campaign was getting the tone all wrong.

The clear hatred of Holyrood, something that Scottish people, from all sides, seem to like and respect well enough, from a bunch of people who have a great deal to lose personally, from  any change in the constitution and the negativity and what most people can see as downright lies, and ridiculously obvious lies at that,are clearly putting people off.

It is getting through to folk that the NO campaign has nothing positive to offer us except WMDs, more embassies than you could shake a stick at, a seat on the UN Security Council, “clout” in the EU (?????) and  some vague promises from David Cameron!!!!! (well we all trust him, don’t we?) about changes in the future (but he’s not telling us what…)

Not one single thing that will get better… just more cuts, more Tory injustices that Scots vote against.

You know, sometimes I feel sorry for those charged with selling this crock of shit to the Scots. 

blunttrauma

@stevie cosmic

A yes vote is a yes vote “grudging” or not. 

Christian Wright

OT – Talking of NOT shamed into reporting what happened – Glasgow City Council leader Gordon Matheson arrested for performing sex act in public. Did so with someone other than his significant other. 

And it is treated with compassion and respect in the Unionist press
heraldscotland.com/…/…

dailyrecord.co.uk/…/…

Pathetic that it is not the lead story in these “newspapers”, but it does get a front page lede to an inside page in the Record at least. The Herald, however, once again confirms its status as McPravda.

Here is the headline as it appears in the Herald:

“Fears for Glasgow council leader’s future over sex act”

Here is the headline had it been an SNP council leader:

“Alex Salmond in crisis as SNP leader arrested for gay sex act in public. ”

Actually, the Record is even worse than the Herald – this is their headline:

“Council chief Gordon Matheson issues public apology after being caught cheating on partner”

No mention of arrest or the sexual offence

Seasick Dave

You know, sometimes I feel sorry for those charged with selling this crock of shit to the Scots.  

 You must be a real soft touch, Tris 🙂

MajorBloodnok

The NO campaign is doing an excellent job of forcing even its natural supporters to look around and think “if this is all the Union has to offer after 300 years surely there must be something better than this”. 

That’s why positive words, actions and a clear vision of the opportunities for social justice (despite Joyce pretending that it’s all vague and not enirely be trusted) from the independence campaign will gently impell the swelling ranks of Don’t Knows to vote YES in 2014.

Right, where do I sign to nominate Ian Davidson for an OBE for his services in defence of the Empire?

Seasick Dave

Ian Davidson for OBE?

You mean an Old Bell End? 

MajorBloodnok

That’s the one.

Franklin

Looks like she was just about choking to admit what little she did. Felt like half the piece was her padding and qualifying statements assuring us the the SNP/independence crowd  ain’t all that great and are probably just as bad, etc.

Pravda behaviour continues all around but maybe this grudging admission of fault for the No campaign is one of the first cracks and a sign of something gathering momentum. 

Kenny Campbell

link to heraldscotland.com
 
This story was on Herald website but buried and not visible form any of the news segments. I had to find it by searching for Matheson. The Herald has a peculiar love in with wee Gordy and so I had commented that the story was miraculously buried and wondered if that would have happened should he have been in another political party…
 
An hour later its on home news front page and my comment deleted….

Christian Wright

Yes, and as noted in my post the Record seems to have been economical with the truth.

From the Herald:

“Glasgow City Council leader Gordon Matheson was apprehended by officers after they witnessed him carrying out the act in a car on the city’s south side.”

 apprehended: Verb

Arrest (someone) for a crime.

Merriam-Webster

Kenny Campbell

Being reported to Fiscal does not always require arrest.

Training Day

Radio Scotland nearly choked on its shortbread breakfast this morning when forced to read out the Record’s and Herald’s coverage of the Matheson story.  It did not, natch, find room for the story in its main news bulletins. 

Christian Wright

Kenny Campbell says:
18 January, 2013 at 9:22 am

Being reported to Fiscal does not always require arrest.

If he was apprehended as the Herald insists, then he was indeed arrested.

Luigi

I may be reading the signs wrong, but I get the impression that there are a number of prominent “unionists”, possibly devomax supporters, that have just stuck their heads above the trenches and have started looking for an excuse to vote YES in 2014?

Marcia

 Joyce McMillan won’t be the only one thinking that. She has come a long way in her political thinking to her present position. The anti side are helping. Thank you Darling.

Re Matheson, I expect a lot of jokes about his ‘Glasgow Kiss’

MajorBloodnok

Maybe Matheson was auditioning for an OBE.  And entirely unbidden, the phrase ‘ointment before entry’ just popped into my head there.  Uuurgh.

Christian Wright

 
MajorBloodnok says:
18 January, 2013 at 9:45 am

 the phrase ‘ointment before entry’ just popped into my head there.  

Seems to me you’re behind the curve with that one, Major. 

Macart

@blunttrauma
“Read that this morning, I think the negativity of the NO campaign is bringing a lot of people into the YES camp.”

SSHHHHHH! They’re doin’ jist fine. 🙂 

Iain

My only concern is that the police took good care of the guide dog belonging to Mr Mathieson’s partner-in-not-quite-a-crime.
 

Morag

Joyce McMillan practially worshipped Gordon Brown, I seem to remember from articles from the late 1990s/early 2000s.  She believed the Labour party could do no wrong.  Well well.

Ray

The Joyce McMillan comments in the piece above is exactly how my wife feels about the whole situation. She’s not overly political or attached to any one party but she considers herself to be somewhat conservative. She’s voted for the Tories during the last couple of elections that have popped up but, like me, she votes for a party after pondering the present and the near future rather than the past or because of some sort of tribal instinct.

Since she’s been made aware of WoS, and the workings of the Scottish/British mainstream media, and after listening to the explanations behind the stories and seeing for herself the utter contempt Westminster politicians have for Scotland, she has gone from a definite No to a probable Yes.

I think it’s safe to say she’s not the only one.

Craig P

If a stone-cold unionist like Joyce McMillan is saying this, Better Together really had better pay attention to how their message is coming across before it is too late for them.
On the other hand, carry on as you are, B.T. 🙂

Major, glad you left that one till after breakfast!

Christian Wright

Marcia says: The anti side are helping. Thank you Darling.

Indeed, we are well served by the enemies providence has provided us.

Doug Daniel

Looking at the completely ambiguous headline (“No Answer Came The Stern Reply”), am I being paranoid in thinking that if this had been a story about the pro-independence side’s behaviour, it would have been something like “I Can’t Vote For Independence” or something?

Joyce’s article reads like someone telling the story of a friend they used to be enthralled to, who they felt could do no wrong. But they’ve just witnessed that friend doing something absolutely heinous, and their faith in that friend has been critically shaken. Her eyes have been opened, and from now on she’ll start to see all the faults for what they are.

Joyce is not the first, and she most certainly won’t be the last. This is one of the reasons why the transfer of votes will only go one way, because a lot of “no” voters simply haven’t been forced to see the union for what it is yet.

Christian Wright

Morag says: Joyce McMillan practially worshipped Gordon Brown, I seem to remember from articles from the late 1990s/early 2000s. She believed the Labour party could do no wrong. Well well.

I think she can convincingly argue that she did not leave the Labour Party, the Labour Party left her,  

Kenny Campbell

“Joyce is not the first, and she most certainly won’t be the last. This is one of the reasons why the transfer of votes will only go one way, because a lot of “no” voters simply haven’t been forced to see the union for what it is yet.”
 
I think that is a critical point, if you are YES today you won’t ever be switching to NO. The same can’t be said for NO voters today.

kininvie

The headline over Joyce’s piece….
link to poetrysoup.com
A sad little tale. Congratulations to the Scotsman sub who thought of the connection.

An Duine Gruamach

My favourite comment on the Scotsman article:

“Is it unhelpful to point out that National Socialism in post-WW1 Germany was borne out of hope too?”

I just… I don’t even… ah… [heid slams down in desk] 

Amanayeman

Anent trying to get to the bottom of the NO campaign’s policy. Do you think Gordon Matheson knows anything about it. ?

The Tree of Liberty

I think an awful lot of Unionists now wish they had included a second question in the Referendum.

Christian Wright

 “trying to get to the bottom of the NO campaign’s policy. Do you think Gordon Matheson knows anything about it. ?”

I’m sure he’ll consider the issue, have a poke around, and should he discover a void, conduct a probe into it. 

David McCann

‘When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser’
Socrates.
How true. How very true.

muttley79

I think Joyce McMilllan is doing a Kevin McKenna.  I reckon she could well gradually be coming round to independence in her recent articles.

McHaggis

On Matheson, such a breach of trust and illegal activity would normally lead to any public servant tendering their immediate resignation.

On Joyce, I believe this is the thin end of the wedge. The apparent silence from the YES campaign suggests to me they believe the frantic, negativity of the NO campaign are doing just a grand job. Of course, I expect there will be a tipping point where the YES campaign will swing into full force and many more will be persuaded of the benefits of independence.

Dcanmore

I predict, without any research whatsoever and using what is known as gut-feeling, that the NO percentage will gradually and continually fall this year. Those people (to whom Devo-Max is preferable) will at first go into the ‘don’t know’ category and then shift later into the YES camp. The final persuasion will be the publication of the White Paper including the FM’s idea of all-inclusive constitution and the realisation that NO means you get nothing except more misery for years to come. I can see a 20-30% shift to the YES camp bringing out a similar result that led to the YES-YES win of 1997.

isleofskye

Extraordinary article by Margaret Curran on 15 Jan – does she have no sense of irony? It’s okay, I do know the answer to that!
“The debate ahead on the future of Scotland has to be more than an accountancy exercise. The tone and tenor of it has to match the high aspirations that people on all sides have for an event of this significance.
As we have been doing from the outset, we will continue to grasp the nettle and deal with the difficult and challenging issues that Scotland has to face with rigour and honesty. It has to be a debate that meets the ambition of the generations of Labour advocates for devolution. In the words of Donald Dewar, Scotland’s first First Minister:
“Introspection will not solve our problems. Nor will preoccupation with constitutional point-scoring. Responding to the needs of the Scottish people is what matters.”
For those of us who have spent a life time in Scottish politics, this is an important opportunity to settle this question once and for all. When Parliament’s debate concludes this afternoon, we will be one step closer to that end.
Margaret Curran MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland
link to labourlist.org

Dal Riata

Those who read Kevin McKenna’s articles in the Guardian/Observer will have noticed his change of tone ever since Lamont’s ‘Something for nothing’ speech and subsequent fallout. Now, having ‘followed’ his warblings for quite a while, from his earlier insulting and unfunny jibes against Scottish independence, the SNP, Salmond, etc. to his latest more mature and questioning stuff about the future of Scotland I’m still wary of this volte-face… but I live in hope that its genuine! We haven’t had the full ‘Damascene conversion’ yet, but you can almost taste it!

As an aside, @Rev Stu: re Kevin McKenna.

I remember some people questioning your decision to move Kevin McKenna from your Zany Comedy Relief section to the Scottish Politics section. Does this now prove that you have the power of prescience? 

From Wiki.:
“Prescience – The power to have instinctive foreknowledge of incoming events. A form of precognition, and a sub-power of precognition.
Capability: The user has instinctive knowledge of events before they happen, and often knows an enemy’s every move and intention before said enemy even decides them.”

Well, well. Who knew?!   🙂

AnneDon

@The Tree of Liberty: In the early stages of the debate, I wondered why the unionists were so agin Devo-Max, yet insisting Alex Salmond secretly wanted it. I still can’t decide if they were just being stupid, or if wee Eck is a genius. I mean, they were being stupid either way, but if Alex Salmond really put them into that position, he definitely is a genius.  He has been very lucky with his enemies! 

Morag

Wee Eck is a genius. That was a masterstroke.

I remember the day the penny dropped for me, in October 2011. Before that, I couldn’t quite figure out what was going on, with all this stuff about indy-lite and devo-max, and journalists crowing that Salmond was just softening up his supporters to get used to the fact that he wasn’t aiming for independence any more. And nobody in the SNP was denying it. Sillars went on a public strop about it. (Now I wonder if he was privately prompted.) That year’s SNP conference had puzzled little fringe meetings trying to work out what was going on.

Then a junior MSP explained it all clearly on Newsnight, and I nearly fell off the sofa. I was absolutely struck dumb with admiration when I realised the trap that had been set.

I thought once it had been explained at least the unionists would figure it out, even though they were in a cleft stick. But they didn’t. They went on walking right into it. They may only be beginning to figure it out now.

charlie

Tried to comment to Joyce McMillan’s piece but bloody hell The Hootsmon site is so slow
Anyhow… embe think the general disillusionment with Scotland Labour will filter down to the Labour Party in England? And mebbe make them realise where they are going wrong as a UK party?

All the best

Charlie


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,666 Posts, 1,201,633 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on How it happened: ““Welcome, our Imperial Masters…”Nov 8, 22:48
    • James on How it happened: “Nah. The site Prick only knows what he reads in his Daily Heil.Nov 8, 22:34
    • Tinto Chiel on How it happened: “The only advantage of the new format seems to be that Tobias Ellwood’s Little Elves who formerly strove ceaselessly to…Nov 8, 22:26
    • Mac on How it happened: “Yeah, I think you are right. The path to independence is not ‘democratically leaving a political union we never voted…Nov 8, 22:07
    • sam on How it happened: “The Moon n PlatoNov 8, 22:06
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: “The Raggit Troosered Kyoab.Nov 8, 21:54
    • James on How it happened: “Tick tock…..Nov 8, 21:49
    • James on How it happened: “You wish, Tory Boy.Nov 8, 21:48
    • James on How it happened: “The Tony Blair-invented ‘Supreme Court’ you mean? LOL. Away and lie in yer water.Nov 8, 21:47
    • James on How it happened: “Scots law or English law? One doesn’t overrule the other because it’s ‘newer’. They are different legal systems. For a…Nov 8, 21:44
    • Mark Beggan on How it happened: “Dr Dogood and the tale of the soiled pants.Nov 8, 21:44
    • Rab Clark on How it happened: “Nice one, thanks. 🙂 These are the other suggestions we’ve had via The Twitter: The Guidmen wi Tatterie Breeks. The…Nov 8, 21:43
    • George Ferguson on How it happened: “I am not a fan of Common Weal after the 2014 Independence Referendum one of their members first action was…Nov 8, 21:42
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: “Aye, plenty data Mac, and much of it informing the ‘UN Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries…Nov 8, 21:41
    • James on How it happened: ““The Bare-Ersed Socialists”?Nov 8, 21:35
    • Mac on How it happened: ““Which is why it is called ‘post’ colonial.” lol. You make me laugh at times Alf. When I thought about…Nov 8, 21:24
    • moixx on How it happened: “I don’t think it’s true, but apparently some people do. Is it because they actually recognise that the woke element…Nov 8, 21:17
    • Dan on How it happened: “Cheers for response George. I’ve not clicked a single like or dislike in all my years online on numerous forums.…Nov 8, 21:17
    • Rab Clark on How it happened: “Some Friday Night Fun… If anyone would like to suggest a Scots title for a translation of ‘The Ragged Trousered…Nov 8, 20:30
    • Aidan on How it happened: “That isn’t just an argument, I would say that is the core driving force behind Scottish independence. Whilst the people…Nov 8, 20:20
    • George Ferguson on How it happened: “Hi Dan, The standard of BTL comments I think has improved. Self-policing has been partially effective. I still remain uncertain…Nov 8, 20:14
    • Jay on How it happened: “On the balance of Ills, it would be less awful that you should be correct.Nov 8, 20:09
    • Jay on How it happened: “Yours seems to be the first suggestion of pressure (rather than force?) from the eastern Mediterranean area, upon Pres P,…Nov 8, 20:06
    • Jay on How it happened: “Where is the reference to your source for quotes in your previous comment? Please do not waste readers’ time. Too…Nov 8, 19:22
    • Dan on How it happened: “Nae bother, the same names have caught a few folk out over the years.Nov 8, 19:16
    • Dan on How it happened: “A few weeks on from “the site upgrade”… Serious question, how is everyone finding trying to follow comments? It’s a…Nov 8, 19:13
    • John Cleary on How it happened: “Ah. Thank you DanNov 8, 19:01
    • Tinto Chiel on How it happened: “I agree, Mia, and we have no freedom and democracy because we have no free press. The MSM are merely…Nov 8, 18:56
    • Dan on How it happened: “It’s a different Liz Lloyd.Nov 8, 18:54
    • Jay on How it happened: “hey Steve, what about some answers to my response to your previous comment? Also, considering that Skip NC has taken…Nov 8, 18:49
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
52
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x