The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Premature evaluation

Posted on February 01, 2012 by

There could have been nothing more predictable in the independence debate than that the Unionist parties, having furiously demanded a clear, simple, yes/no question for the last eight months, would be in a tumultuous rage when they finally got one. The First Minister had barely announced the Scottish Government’s chosen ten-word proposition to the Scottish people when a chorus of angry voices in the Unionist camp were on the airwaves denouncing it as “leading”, “unfair” and “rigged”.

Supposed experts were hastily summoned to explain to us how the phrasing of the question was designed to lead brainless voters down a “cognitive chute”, because the poor stupid Scottish electorate had no idea of what the SNP meant by “independent”. The Telegraph leapt into action, conducting its own polls with various possible versions of the question in an attempt to demonstrate how widely responses could be altered by simple changes in wording. It then swiftly wrote up the results in doom-laden terms, thundering in the article’s strapline that:

“The “loaded” question Alex Salmond wants to ask in the Scottish independence referendum leads to at least a 10-point increase in public support for ending the Union”

That analysis came a little TOO swiftly, as it turned out.

Because the Telegraph left the polls running after it published the story, and as the sample size grew, something very odd happened. The results for the different versions of the question all started to coalesce around almost identical numbers. Rather than the 10% variation described in the story, four out of the five options delivered outcomes that were only fractionally different. At the time of writing, the results (which you can see for yourself by going to the page linked in the second paragraph of this piece and clicking the “View Results” button for each poll) were as follows:

Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?
YES 52%
NO 48%

Do you want Scotland to remain part of the United Kingdom?
YES 51%
NO 49%

Do you want Scotland to leave the United Kingdom and become an independent country?
YES 51%
NO 49%

Do you want Scotland to leave the United Kingdom and become a separate nation?
YES 51%
NO 49%

Do you think the Scottish Parliament’s powers should be extended to enable independence to be achieved?
YES 44%
NO 56%

Even the outlier version at the end, asking an absurd question even we don’t understand (exactly which extended powers would “enable” independence to be achieved, rather than actually achieving it in themselves?), only managed to bring about a 7% swing. Of the three other versions, two resulted in independence winning by 51-49 and 52-48, including the one featuring the S-word on which the Unionist camp appears to be mainly pinning its hopes thus far.

Interestingly, the FUDs had more luck with a “positive” question (that is, one seeking a Yes answer for the Union rather than for independence) than with the scaremongering negative versions, scoring a narrow victory with the simple “Do you want Scotland to remain part of the UK?”, a formulation which has absolutely no chance of being adopted. But although it changed the result, even that question only actually altered the vote by 3% compared to the Scottish Government’s proposed version (the first one listed above), not the 10% claimed by the Telegraph.

We commend the Telegraph for leaving the piece on the site to be mocked, even though the entire text is now totally at odds with the reality. Perhaps in time the numbers will evolve further and we’ll be the ones looking stupid. But for now, amidst the fiery heat of debate, we can all enjoy a little light relief at their expense.

1 to “Premature evaluation”

  1. Shodan says:

    The SNP and others on the independance camp seem to be very pleased at this poll. A poll on the Torygraph (of all places) and it still shows either support or a very close run battle after several thousand votes. So much for their polls claiming no one wanted it to happen. Cheers Telegraph, the independance camp could do with more of this sort of help.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,868 Posts, 1,234,638 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • PC Foster on The Secondhand Amendment: “https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/why-i-am-suing-my-trade-union/Jan 20, 19:23
    • agentx on The Secondhand Amendment: “On what date was Scotland colonised?Jan 20, 18:53
    • Dunx on The Secondhand Amendment: “@Lorna AI does seem to make up facts. Try asking ChatGPT if a woman can have a penis.Jan 20, 16:35
    • robertkknight on The Secondhand Amendment: “The Marmalade Man-babyJan 20, 15:19
    • TURABDIN on The Secondhand Amendment: “WHY IS TRUMP SO ANGRY? https://archive.ph/OJUzd Infantile peavishness or too much constipation causing American food? Henry 8, that figures.Jan 20, 14:47
    • sam on The Secondhand Amendment: “100%Yes below. Yes, 100% Yes. Assimilation of Intuit culture and monopolised tradeJan 20, 14:35
    • Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Was listening to Scotcast re the FWS case against the SG on the question of men in the women’s prison…Jan 20, 14:11
    • Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““timed to do maximum damage to the independence vote” Wow! Professor Baird believes the SNP are still driving hard for…Jan 20, 13:52
    • Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Yes, Nae Need, I agree. However, I can understand the self-interest of those who claim to be ‘trans’. That does…Jan 20, 13:43
    • Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Computers cannot make up facts that are not actually there. They can introduce errors as to provenance. This is not…Jan 20, 13:28
    • Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “She knows that AI could not have made some of the errors in the way they were made. It had…Jan 20, 13:19
    • Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Of course, AI is used extensively, but not in the way that this judgement pans out, so, either lies are…Jan 20, 13:09
    • Confused on The Secondhand Amendment: “aircrew training video for the new F47 stealth superfighter (this should be the real top gun) www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECRWT9TEaj0 us foreign policy…Jan 20, 13:01
    • Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “James, every piece of legislation, in Scotland’s history, and every piece of legislation in England’s history referred to two sexes…Jan 20, 12:59
    • Confused on The Secondhand Amendment: “not you, Scotland! https://archive.ph/PrffD but wait … trump is on a roll; while “the current thing” is no longer iran,…Jan 20, 12:59
    • 100%Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “No mention of the Inuits, why am I not surprised. Took great detail to write the Kingdom of Denmark, interesting…Jan 20, 12:46
    • Alf Baird on The Secondhand Amendment: ““it’s hard to know it’s true meaning and who exactly is a fascist” According to Cesaire, numerous intellectuals including Robinson,…Jan 20, 12:43
    • James Cheyne on Learning Insanity: “Lorna, Do not confuse the two separate speeches the monarch made as they were on two separate chronological time lines.…Jan 20, 12:37
    • James on Learning Insanity: “Really? That’s all you two losers have got? The great Unionist debaters. LOL. Mass debaters maybe.Jan 20, 12:32
    • PC Foster on The Secondhand Amendment: “I wonder how much scope Murrell has to spill the beans on his wife or will he mysteriously die between…Jan 20, 12:24
    • James Cheyne on The Secondhand Amendment: “From political attacks on farmers in France to British farmers to American farmers. From trans cults in Canada to it…Jan 20, 12:15
    • sam on The Secondhand Amendment: “?Foreign Affairs Committee? ?@afet.europarl.europa.eu?· 59m Today at 13.00 European Parliament will discuss territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the…Jan 20, 12:07
    • James Cheyne on The Secondhand Amendment: “We can only accept it was a America problem if we discount every other Country that is under going the…Jan 20, 11:56
    • sam on The Secondhand Amendment: “Ms Forstater says of Judge Kemp’s error: ““The quote in my section wasn’t found anywhere else, so it was either…Jan 20, 11:47
    • Alf Baird on The Secondhand Amendment: “According to postcolonial theory all we can ever expect in a colonial society is a ‘mediocre meritocracy’ (Memmi), much as…Jan 20, 11:29
    • Alf Baird on The Secondhand Amendment: ““Timing as broadly predicted by many on here!” Yes, colonial ‘justice’ seems predictable, in this instance timed to do maximum…Jan 20, 11:08
    • TURABDIN on The Secondhand Amendment: “EUROPE & THE YANKEE BULLY BOY & HIS BAGGAGE Could the EU be getting its mojo back. Conceived as the…Jan 20, 10:38
    • Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: “Jane Russell, eh? Whew, what a scorcher! But I thought she was deid. How depressing that while still alive she’s…Jan 20, 10:13
    • sam on The Secondhand Amendment: “Is it possible that Ms Russell is the “judicial colleague” who exchanged correspondence with Judge Kemp? On the face of…Jan 20, 10:12
    • James Cheyne on The Secondhand Amendment: “In Lorna’ version of the treaty of union case being real you will find only two biological sexes entered into…Jan 20, 10:03
  • A tall tale



↑ Top