The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?

Posted on April 28, 2010 by

One of the most striking things about the current election is the BBC's total abandonment of even a pretence at impartiality with regard to the nationalist parties in Scotland and Wales (and other smaller parties like UKIP too), which is most obviously visible in the Corporation's determined exclusion of them from the defining theatre of the campaign – the leaders' debates.

In the light of protests pointing out that excluding what Ofcom defines as "main parties" in Scotland and Wales during an election is against broadcasting regulations, the BBC (and ITV and Sky, although the latter subsequently broke ranks – see above) hastily rebranded the programmes as "Prime Ministerial debates", and insisted that they were only for the politicians contesting the keys to 10 Downing Street.

The gigantic irony, of course, is that it looks increasingly as if NONE of the participants in the debates will actually be the next Prime Minister.

Indeed, only one of them even has a vaguely realistic chance. Nick Clegg won't be the next PM, because our crooked electoral system ensures that the Lib Dems will have by far the smallest number of seats. Gordon Brown has no chance of achieving a majority, and Clegg has already explicitly ruled out supporting Brown as a minority PM.

So right away, of the three debaters, we're down to David Cameron. His chances of achieving a majority also look slim, but are still just about within the realms of possibility, especially with the support of the Ulster Unionists. But time is running out for the Tories to build the sort of margin they need to secure a majority against the Labour bias built in to the constituency system.

If the polls stay roughly where they are, the most likely next Prime Minister of the UK is a Labour MP who isn't Gordon Brown. The exact identity of this hypothetical person is currently unknown. Alan Johnson has considerable support within the party, and has recently made fairly unambiguous overtures towards the Lib Dems about PR – something he also has a previous record of favouring and seems to be genuine about.

But other candidates including David Miliband and Ed Balls might also challenge for the leadership in the event of Clegg demanding Brown's head as the price of his support. The one thing that seems certain about this least certain of elections is that one way or another, Brown is going to require the services of a removal firm come May 7th.

An interesting thing about the governance of the UK is that the Prime Minister, like other ministers, doesn't have to be an MP at all. (Which negates another of the BBC's attempted defences, namely that Alex Salmond isn't standing for a Westminster constituency this time round.) If a ruling party – or coalition – wants a particular person in its Cabinet and they haven't been elected, all that's required is a swift ennobling so that they're a member of the House Of Lords, and they can serve in government.

In such a way was the Sith Lord Baron Mandelson elevated to a position of administrative power, and so could anyone else be. Were Labour to find itself with the fewest votes but the most seats, and with Clegg blackballing Brown, they could anoint anyone they liked as their leader. They could go for national treasure Dale Winton as a unity candidate if they wanted, and with Lib Dem approval Lord Winton of Sweepshire would find himself discussing the next Queen's Speech with Her Majesty.

Alternatively, they could go for a sporting hero loved in many parts of the UK. Kenny Dalglish would have support in Scotland, in the North-East (Blackburn, Newcastle), the North-West (Liverpool) and more, and he certainly has top-level managerial experience.

He's a born winner, but also statesmanlike in a crisis. The SNP would back him if their votes were also needed in the new coalition. (He's a national hero, and imagine how much it would upset all those Union-loving Rangers fans.) And he'd be at least as honest and straightforward in debates and interviews as the candidates we have now.

"Prime Minister, are you going to renew Trident?"

"Mibbes aye, mibbes naw."

We can but dream our dreams.

6 to “Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?”

  1. Dean says:

    I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them.

    So the SNP are on, they win the debate, they're clearly the best party… oh.
    If they stood people in every constituency I imagine they'd have a claim that couldn't be challenged.

    Reply
  2. Grant says:

    I'm beginning to worry about what's going to happen.
    Take a look at this page, written by an Nate Silver, an American statistics nerd(who correctly forecast 49 out of 50 of the state results in Obama/McCain and whose prediction came within 0.1% of the popular vote):
    link to fivethirtyeight.com;
    Look at the second table in particular. Based on some very realistic assumptions, he has the Tories really close to victory with Ulster support. This, or anything worse (just 10 more seats for the Tories) and we have the nightmare scenario of a Tory win, and the end of the electoral reform debate. Because you can be sure the news narrative will be that the people have spoken, we wanted the Tories, and in the end we didn't want a hung parliament. Your average joe will go back to being totally disillusioned, and probably voting Labour again in 5 years time for more of the same.
    It's probably too difficult to finesse this now, but I believe that if you're in a Labour/Tory marginal, no matter how much you want to up the Lib Dem vote to make a statement, you have to vote Labour to keep the Tory seat total down and bring about the Lib Dem/Labour coalition we want. I
    For what it's worth, this guy makes the same argument:
    link to guardian.co.uk

    Reply
  3. Grant says:

    That first link should have been:
    link to fivethirtyeight.com

    Reply
  4. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    "I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them."

    The sensible solution is to have a half-hour show after the debate, shown only on BBC Scotland, in which Alex Salmond is asked the same questions the other leaders were asked.

    Reply
  5. Dean says:

    That sounds perfectly reasonable. I'd also have been in favour of a fourth debate with the three of them plus the Scottish and Welsh ministers.

    On the other hand, it's amusing that the Tories were part of the Scottish debate – do they even bother standing candidates there anymore?!

    Reply
  6. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Mm, indeed. The SNP's proportion of Westminster seats is only about 1% below the Tories' proportion of Scottish seats, despite the Tories standing in 100% of Scottish seats and the SNP only standing in about 8% of Westminster seats. So it's hard to see by what criteria the Tories were allowed in the Scotland-only debates, if the SNP weren't allowed in the "British" (actually English) ones…

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,750 Posts, 1,217,214 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • twathater on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “I have been posting comments on WOS and many other independence sites since 2014 some people agree with them some…May 7, 02:58
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “The MSM is reporting that President Trump has announced that the Hotties have hoisted the white flag. There does seem…May 6, 20:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Something else just occurred to me. Why didn’t the people of Clydebank just shout in unison “Bairns Not Bombs” at…May 6, 20:26
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: ““in various hot places not so near to here, the establishment, of which Sturgeon is a fully paid up member,…May 6, 20:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Your post has been up for several hours now, yet none of the usual suspects have jumped in with the…May 6, 19:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: ““a fetish for rectoral positions” Gigity!May 6, 19:41
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Thank you for your interesting comment, Michael. I tried replying earlier today with footage of the Clydebank Blitz which certainly…May 6, 19:31
    • Bilbo on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Stop talking rubbish you twat.May 6, 18:49
    • Yoon Scum on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “I know that this will be dismissed as FAR RIGHT ANTI-SCOTTISH HATE SPEECH FROM THE ENGLISH SCUM WHO SHALL BE…May 6, 18:37
    • Bilbo on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “FFS, calm down everybody. Twat has numerous meanings and Twathater is using it int the context of a foolish or…May 6, 18:34
    • Mia on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Yes, now that I have calmed down a bit and I have had a bit more time to think, suddenly…May 6, 17:54
    • Yoon Scum on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “The more I look at the plans for the economy , the currency and the people we have in Holyrood…May 6, 17:18
    • Mia on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “The political fraud Sturgeon is quoted in the Herald as saying: “The question for me and I think for a…May 6, 17:14
    • SilentMajority on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “The Sturgeon revisionist bio will certainly be a hoot…hopefully straight into the recycle waste via the ‘bargain bin’.May 6, 14:39
    • Andrew scott on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “She/it/they is/are a HORRIBLE HARRIDANMay 6, 14:30
    • Michael Laing on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “An interesting account, albeit the Germans didn’t have four-engined bombers. Unless I’m mistaken, all their bombers were twin-engined.May 6, 14:10
    • Marie on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “And no apology to women and girls. Sturgeon is arrogant deluded and dangerous.May 6, 13:07
    • Michael Laing on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “The lives of unemployed and ill and disabled people are ‘almost unliveable’. Indeed, many have been forced to live on…May 6, 13:01
    • Stuart MacKay on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Meanwhile in various hot places not so near to here, the establishment, of which Sturgeon is a fully paid up…May 6, 12:59
    • Dave Hansell on The Takeover: “Well, Hatey. I would debate the issue with you – and have tried to on several occasions over the past…May 6, 12:43
    • Vivian O’Blivion on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Speaking to reporters in the Scottish Parliament Sturgeon told reporters : “… in my mind that we are at risk…May 6, 12:17
    • Jay on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “In a few years reading Wings, i have not seen such an ignorant attempt at criticising Rev Campbell as that…May 6, 12:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “@William G Walker He sometimes asks people on here if they are heterosexual or homosexual. Read into that what you…May 6, 12:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Hands up everyone who absolutely loves, LOVES! I tell you, the proud, patriotic, nationalist, blue-arsed Scots, who don’t know the…May 6, 12:08
    • Jay on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Agree with WG Walker, hating that female anatomy suggests some of the worst aspects of the trans movement, therefore a…May 6, 12:06
    • Oneliner on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “AGREED. But I doubt your viewpoint will gain much traction with the people of Grangemouth. Whilst the Rev is right…May 6, 10:54
    • William G Walker on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “How I AGREE with twathater’s comments on how much the SNP has changed over the last ten years or so…May 6, 10:44
    • diabloandco on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Twathater ,round of applause from me!May 6, 09:08
    • Chas on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “That rant is a hate crime. I am unsure why Stu gives you a platform for your bigoted racist posts…May 6, 08:21
    • Anthem on Let’s Make Jen Safe Again: “Well said! ?May 6, 08:21
  • A tall tale



↑ Top