The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?

Posted on April 28, 2010 by

One of the most striking things about the current election is the BBC's total abandonment of even a pretence at impartiality with regard to the nationalist parties in Scotland and Wales (and other smaller parties like UKIP too), which is most obviously visible in the Corporation's determined exclusion of them from the defining theatre of the campaign – the leaders' debates.

In the light of protests pointing out that excluding what Ofcom defines as "main parties" in Scotland and Wales during an election is against broadcasting regulations, the BBC (and ITV and Sky, although the latter subsequently broke ranks – see above) hastily rebranded the programmes as "Prime Ministerial debates", and insisted that they were only for the politicians contesting the keys to 10 Downing Street.

The gigantic irony, of course, is that it looks increasingly as if NONE of the participants in the debates will actually be the next Prime Minister.

Indeed, only one of them even has a vaguely realistic chance. Nick Clegg won't be the next PM, because our crooked electoral system ensures that the Lib Dems will have by far the smallest number of seats. Gordon Brown has no chance of achieving a majority, and Clegg has already explicitly ruled out supporting Brown as a minority PM.

So right away, of the three debaters, we're down to David Cameron. His chances of achieving a majority also look slim, but are still just about within the realms of possibility, especially with the support of the Ulster Unionists. But time is running out for the Tories to build the sort of margin they need to secure a majority against the Labour bias built in to the constituency system.

If the polls stay roughly where they are, the most likely next Prime Minister of the UK is a Labour MP who isn't Gordon Brown. The exact identity of this hypothetical person is currently unknown. Alan Johnson has considerable support within the party, and has recently made fairly unambiguous overtures towards the Lib Dems about PR – something he also has a previous record of favouring and seems to be genuine about.

But other candidates including David Miliband and Ed Balls might also challenge for the leadership in the event of Clegg demanding Brown's head as the price of his support. The one thing that seems certain about this least certain of elections is that one way or another, Brown is going to require the services of a removal firm come May 7th.

An interesting thing about the governance of the UK is that the Prime Minister, like other ministers, doesn't have to be an MP at all. (Which negates another of the BBC's attempted defences, namely that Alex Salmond isn't standing for a Westminster constituency this time round.) If a ruling party – or coalition – wants a particular person in its Cabinet and they haven't been elected, all that's required is a swift ennobling so that they're a member of the House Of Lords, and they can serve in government.

In such a way was the Sith Lord Baron Mandelson elevated to a position of administrative power, and so could anyone else be. Were Labour to find itself with the fewest votes but the most seats, and with Clegg blackballing Brown, they could anoint anyone they liked as their leader. They could go for national treasure Dale Winton as a unity candidate if they wanted, and with Lib Dem approval Lord Winton of Sweepshire would find himself discussing the next Queen's Speech with Her Majesty.

Alternatively, they could go for a sporting hero loved in many parts of the UK. Kenny Dalglish would have support in Scotland, in the North-East (Blackburn, Newcastle), the North-West (Liverpool) and more, and he certainly has top-level managerial experience.

He's a born winner, but also statesmanlike in a crisis. The SNP would back him if their votes were also needed in the new coalition. (He's a national hero, and imagine how much it would upset all those Union-loving Rangers fans.) And he'd be at least as honest and straightforward in debates and interviews as the candidates we have now.

"Prime Minister, are you going to renew Trident?"

"Mibbes aye, mibbes naw."

We can but dream our dreams.

6 to “Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?”

  1. Dean says:

    I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them.

    So the SNP are on, they win the debate, they're clearly the best party… oh.
    If they stood people in every constituency I imagine they'd have a claim that couldn't be challenged.

    Reply
  2. Grant says:

    I'm beginning to worry about what's going to happen.
    Take a look at this page, written by an Nate Silver, an American statistics nerd(who correctly forecast 49 out of 50 of the state results in Obama/McCain and whose prediction came within 0.1% of the popular vote):
    link to fivethirtyeight.com;
    Look at the second table in particular. Based on some very realistic assumptions, he has the Tories really close to victory with Ulster support. This, or anything worse (just 10 more seats for the Tories) and we have the nightmare scenario of a Tory win, and the end of the electoral reform debate. Because you can be sure the news narrative will be that the people have spoken, we wanted the Tories, and in the end we didn't want a hung parliament. Your average joe will go back to being totally disillusioned, and probably voting Labour again in 5 years time for more of the same.
    It's probably too difficult to finesse this now, but I believe that if you're in a Labour/Tory marginal, no matter how much you want to up the Lib Dem vote to make a statement, you have to vote Labour to keep the Tory seat total down and bring about the Lib Dem/Labour coalition we want. I
    For what it's worth, this guy makes the same argument:
    link to guardian.co.uk

    Reply
  3. Grant says:

    That first link should have been:
    link to fivethirtyeight.com

    Reply
  4. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    "I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them."

    The sensible solution is to have a half-hour show after the debate, shown only on BBC Scotland, in which Alex Salmond is asked the same questions the other leaders were asked.

    Reply
  5. Dean says:

    That sounds perfectly reasonable. I'd also have been in favour of a fourth debate with the three of them plus the Scottish and Welsh ministers.

    On the other hand, it's amusing that the Tories were part of the Scottish debate – do they even bother standing candidates there anymore?!

    Reply
  6. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Mm, indeed. The SNP's proportion of Westminster seats is only about 1% below the Tories' proportion of Scottish seats, despite the Tories standing in 100% of Scottish seats and the SNP only standing in about 8% of Westminster seats. So it's hard to see by what criteria the Tories were allowed in the Scotland-only debates, if the SNP weren't allowed in the "British" (actually English) ones…

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,776 Posts, 1,219,726 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Wullie B on The Grand Tour: “I think you might have a pleasant surprise from Banff and Buchan, believe it or not, between the fishing and…Jun 11, 00:25
    • Heaver on The Grand Tour: “Slag off some minorities. That’ll get you noticed. Works for Farage.Jun 10, 23:55
    • Willie on The Grand Tour: “Interesting day tomorrow in parliament. Will the vote on the decision released late tonight by the Scottish Government be enough…Jun 10, 23:49
    • Eddie Munster on The Grand Tour: “Alba are list only so to not split the indy vote, they’ve been saying that for a long time now.…Jun 10, 23:41
    • Bill Cowan on The Grand Tour: “ALBA a complete no-show? And what of the combination of all the other Indy parties, groups, and individuals, Liberate Scotland?Jun 10, 23:12
    • Jim Anderson on The Grand Tour: “S Gethins is earmarked to replace the useless Shona in Dundee East.Jun 10, 22:40
    • George Ferguson on The Grand Tour: “Excellent analysis Stu as usual. I can’t disagree with any of it. Slightly disconcerting to me trying to stand as…Jun 10, 22:22
    • sarah on The Grand Tour: “Rev, I take it that you don’t think that ANY SNP candidate can lose Edinburgh Eastern, given that Ash Denham/Regan…Jun 10, 21:57
    • KEITH HYND on The Grand Tour: “Even if the SNP were the only option on the ballot paper I still wouldn’t vote for them. They need…Jun 10, 21:50
    • Aidan on Two Of A Kind: “That’s not what you’ve been saying over the past few weeks and months though is itJun 10, 21:39
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on The Grand Tour: “Edited, ta.Jun 10, 21:23
    • Viscount Ennui on The Grand Tour: “Just wondering if anyone has put in an FOI about how the Scottish bond initiative is going. I am so…Jun 10, 21:21
    • Hatey McHateface on Two Of A Kind: ““when did the north and south of Scotland become reconciled, and see themselves as one nation?” Yet to happen, IMO.…Jun 10, 20:54
    • @nairnkev on The Grand Tour: “You need to get the slacker cartoonist to produce a visual of a stinking festering corpse blocking the door to…Jun 10, 20:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Two Of A Kind: ““the management of North Sea resources” Aha! That’s what’s really getting their goat. It’s Scotland’s oil. They missed a trick…Jun 10, 20:42
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on The Grand Tour: “Eh? I did.Jun 10, 20:32
    • sarah on The Grand Tour: “Constituencies SNP 56, Labour 9, LibDem 3, Conservatives 5.Jun 10, 20:31
    • Gary on The Grand Tour: “Would it be possible to finish the job, and add up the seats?Jun 10, 20:13
    • John McTaggart on The Grand Tour: “Annabelle Ewing is standing down in Cowdenbeath. I’m not sure if the selection has been made yet but I’d think…Jun 10, 19:37
    • Dan on Two Of A Kind: “Oh aye, here’s another splitter unable to get behind the original ISP formation. Fucked off to the US because he…Jun 10, 18:02
    • sarah on Two Of A Kind: “To clarify the UN procedure for being recognised as a Non-Self-Governing State, an existing member state of the UN can…Jun 10, 17:29
    • factfinder on Two Of A Kind: “James says: 10 June, 2025 at 4:13 pm “Factfinder” [lol] – read it and weep, sunshine No need for tears,…Jun 10, 17:00
    • AndrewR on Two Of A Kind: “factfinder The Schools Bill is really interesting. This is a general question to the forum: when did the north and…Jun 10, 16:51
    • Aidan on Two Of A Kind: “Taken from JPTI’s website today: “The C-24 has very strict rules. Only regions already on the UN’s official list of…Jun 10, 16:23
    • Willie on Two Of A Kind: “Just read this as I sit on a train on the West coast line travelling to Glasgow Partick. Only going…Jun 10, 16:17
    • James on Two Of A Kind: ““Factfinder” [lol] – read it and weep, sunshine. “…Most importantly, Scotland lacks international legal personality, is not permitted to conduct…Jun 10, 16:13
    • factfinder on Two Of A Kind: “The deliberate campaign to eradicate Gaelic language and culture was, of course, started long before 1707. The Establishment of Schools…Jun 10, 15:23
    • Northcode on Two Of A Kind: “Thanks for the link, Alf. Very helpful. This from the Justice pour Tous Internationale (JPTi) website : Building on two…Jun 10, 13:54
    • Alf Baird on Two Of A Kind: “Instead of playing British politics, here is what the SNP leadership should have been doing long ago, taking Scotland’s case…Jun 10, 13:14
    • Oneliner on Two Of A Kind: “The Kosher and Halal punters will only screw it upJun 10, 13:02
  • A tall tale



↑ Top