The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A peek behind the curtain

Posted on June 24, 2012 by

After last weekend’s bizarre time-travelling “exclusive”, this weekend’s Sunday Herald has thrown up another little curiosity. A story in the lead section of the paper’s website today trumpets the latest positive argument from the Unionist camp – that mortgage rates will soar in an independent Scotland, as alleged by Danny Alexander.

The piece, penned by Tom Gordon, is headlined accordingly – “Alexander claims: yes to independence could mean mortgage rise”. What’s interesting, though, is a little piece of text that seems to have been left in by accident at the bottom of the page.

It appears to be a discarded alternative headline for the same article, given that the fourth paragraph cites “the SNP Government” dismissing Alexander’s claims as scare stories. (We did check by Googling to see if the headline had appeared on a completely different Herald piece, but turned up nothing.)

It’s quite instructive to see the paper’s thought processes laid bare. “Scottish Government Slam Scare Tactics” is a positive message from the SNP’s point of view, as it would portray them standing up against Unionist fearmongering.

The headline used instead is the complete opposite – it actually IS Unionist fearmongering, designed to produce an instinctively frightened reaction in the reader, by planting in his/her mind the image of a crippling rise in the cost of living and associating it with a Yes vote (no matter what the feature then goes on to say).

We just thought we’d point it out.

7 to “A peek behind the curtain”

  1. andrew_haddow says:

    I posted a reference to this on Herald website – wonder if it’ll get past moderators.

    Reply
  2. andrew_haddow says:

    Whoops! ‘Alternative’ headline has disappeared and no sign o my comment. Looks like yer no allowed tae criticise the Herald!

    Reply
  3. McHaggis says:

    Amazingly, contributors on the Herald site have begun to debate the position!

    How that is possible when the most important part of the (non)story is highlighted in bold below –
    “Alexander Claims yes to independence could mean mortgage rise”

    So what they are leading on is an unsubstantiated claim of something that may or may not happen. Wow! our so-called quality newspapers are hardly better than the red-tops these days.

    Reply
  4. Arbroath1320 says:

    Guys, isn’t it obvious?
     
    Firstly, the Dependence Brigade consider we Scots ARE “Too wee. Too poor, Too stupid”. Therefore they feel all they have to do is spread RUMOUR and SUSPICION about something, the MSM will pick up on it and run the story. Now because, according to the D.B., we are all too stupid we will all believe the story as FACT!
     
    Secondly, this piece proves, yet again, that the D.B. have absolutely NOTHING in their armoury which they can use that will provide POSITIVE proof that the union is good for Scotland.
     
    Thirdly, it is interesting that this piece is “alleged” news about something which may or more likely may NOT happen whilst the story about the Cameroon Bar attacking under 25’s is not even mentioned int this great paper of wisdom and truth!
     
    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  5. Morag says:

    Maybe I can at least clarify the headline thing.  I have the dead-tree paper in front of me.  The layout has the main “Alexander claims….” headline first, then there is a picture of Alexander with his mouth open and looking slightly glaiket, then underneath that in a smaller point size but bold capitals is the sub-heading “Scottish government slam ‘scare tactics'”.  Under that, in the same type face but in red, it reads “by Tom Gordon”.
     
    Hope that helps.

    Reply
  6. Peninsula says:

    The Herald are just as bad as all the others, from what I’ve found. Worse in some ways.

    I’ve found they will not post perfectly reasonable comments – especially responses questioning the validity of the statistics of anti-independence supporters such as Michael Mckeown

    I’ve also written legitimate comments about unionists politicians possibly being motivated by personal gain (or loss) in the event of a Yes vote.

    i.e whether their career ambitions in London are fuelling their drive against independence. These never get published by the Herald.

    e.g I posted a comment here link to heraldscotland.com on whether Darling might be thinking about a seat in the House of Lords.  

    It was never published. This happens a lot.

    Reply
  7. Morag says:

    Yes, Peninsula, that’s happened to me a lot too.  I’ve given up bothering posting there, because it’s so often just a waste of typing.
     
    The sub-headline thing seems pretty unsuspicious though.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,297 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “Was Ally MacLeod a reincarnation of Charles Edward Stuart?May 23, 11:46
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “A small and inconsequential point, perhaps. But one I’d like to make. I do not favour the term ‘Scottish independence’…May 23, 11:33
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: “Discuss.May 23, 11:26
    • Captain Caveman on The shifting sands of memory: “@Alf Baird Wrong as usual. The “Scots” don’t purely comprise of Picts, but other ethnicities as well, most notably (but…May 23, 11:20
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “If only Bonnie dick head had taken a bullet at Culloden.May 23, 11:12
    • sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “ON Topic: Leaving the false Union is, of course, the answer to almost every social and economic ill that Scotland…May 23, 10:54
    • Alf Baird on The shifting sands of memory: “Us Picts are still here, merely under a different name, i.e. Scots.May 23, 10:51
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “Good points well made and nicely summarised, James. One of the many notable things about the Scots is that we…May 23, 10:37
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““The British Empire, at its peak, encompassed a vast network of territories and dominions ruled by the United Kingdom. It…May 23, 10:32
    • Alf Baird on The shifting sands of memory: “Excellent summary of a colonised and therefore ‘doun-hauden’ (i.e oppressed) people, James. Albert Memmi explained the process whereby the colonizer…May 23, 10:19
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “One of the issues of a Colonised Country is the removal of its Culture, and their history, But along with…May 23, 09:40
    • Captain Caveman on The shifting sands of memory: ““Inbred foreigners” If we’re going back to Roman times as per Scot Finlayson’s post, the question is: who in Europe…May 23, 09:23
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The shifting sands of memory: “James Kelly, the Cumbernauld Copernicus dismissed four UK wide, Westminster voting intention polls in a row that put the SNP…May 23, 09:10
    • Anthem on The shifting sands of memory: “True, but a Scot says, led by a bunch of inbred foreigners.May 23, 09:09
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “It sounds like turning up uninvited to the UNCDC in June might actually involve quite a lot of messing about…May 23, 08:47
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “@Hatey – and the UNCDC determined it was not within their remit because they aren’t one of the 17 recognised…May 23, 08:39
    • Captain Caveman on The shifting sands of memory: “Scot Finlayson said: “England has always been a conquered country” Easily verifiable, pre-GCSE level historical facts say: “… At its…May 23, 08:34
    • Tartanpigsy on The shifting sands of memory: “Wow! Wow! Wow! Makes me happy to have Scottish Independence being discussed in these pages Good discussion being had albeit…May 23, 08:22
    • Scot Finlayson on The shifting sands of memory: “The Italian Romans conquered most of England in about 40 years, stayed there for 400 years then the German Saxons…May 23, 08:08
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Craig Murray the ham ass supporter? That Craig Murray? Oh dear. That’s it fucked then. May as well cancel it…May 23, 07:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “@Aidan Thanks for the link. They’ve had “decades of genocide” an a’. Has anybody else noticed how genocide’s no what…May 23, 07:22
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The shifting sands of memory: “Labour have thrown in the clout at Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse. On Monday the bookies had the SNP at 64%…May 23, 07:19
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “Well wouldn’t you look at that: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/30/west-papua-independence-petition-is-rebuffed-at-unMay 23, 05:58
    • agent x on The shifting sands of memory: “No I am not Yoon Scum.May 22, 23:43
    • Oneliner on The shifting sands of memory: “Does England have a Navy? Yep the MOD – such a cracking good employer that we have to bail them…May 22, 22:58
    • Wullie B on The shifting sands of memory: “It was once said that the sun never set on the British empire, what they forgot to put was the…May 22, 22:56
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: ““Aidan” Mind and take yer Big Book of Unionist Myths with you in case you get stuck.May 22, 22:55
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: ““agent x” That you, Yoon Scum? Reads awfy similar….May 22, 22:51
    • Wullie B on The shifting sands of memory: “You do realise that no note over £5 whether printed in Scotland or England is legal tender dont youMay 22, 22:29
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “Great news – I’ll be in Estonia, but can you link me to where I can watch the hearing online,…May 22, 22:14
  • A tall tale



↑ Top