Wings Over Scotland

Recent Comments

• Aidan on The tint of rose: “No Mia, it’s 180 degrees the other way. The treaty required the two separate parliaments each to dispose of incompatible…” Mar 14, 13:49
• Mia on The tint of rose: ““If the authors of the ToU intended to impose that significant restriction, they would have done so explicitly” And they…” Mar 14, 13:17
• Young Lochinvar on Signal and noise: “Aha! Press reporting that SHE whose name shall not be uttered is still under investigation in Branchform. “Timing” again anyone?” Mar 14, 13:09
• Aidan on Signal and noise: “A combination of very little going on in the pro-Indy front, and the deluge of cranks and trolls who, like…” Mar 14, 12:38
• Aidan on The tint of rose: “@Mia – no it doesn’t stand to reason at all, that implication would have an enormous impact on future union…” Mar 14, 12:31
• Chas on Signal and noise: “Very few comments being posted on Wings nowadays. Even the nutters and cranks who posted umpteen times, every day, now…” Mar 14, 11:36
• agent x on Signal and noise: “I saw reports that Sturgeon had put her name forward for re-election in 2026. Was it published anywhere that she…” Mar 14, 11:35
• willie on Signal and noise: “So Swinney has had tea and biscuits with Eric Trump. Not bad for a man who only a few weeks…” Mar 14, 11:25
• Mia on The tint of rose: ““Clause XXV does not say that at all, it says that the respective parliaments shall void incompatible laws, it doesn’t…” Mar 14, 11:20
• Lorn on The evolution of fairness: “On that we can agree, NN.” Mar 14, 10:54
• Aidan on The tint of rose: “@Mia – Clause XXV does not say that at all, it says that the respective parliaments shall void incompatible laws,…” Mar 14, 10:51
• Aidan on The tint of rose: “@Xaracen – there is no distinction between constitutional law and domestic law, constitutional law is domestic law by its own…” Mar 14, 10:43
• Mia on The tint of rose: ““your views hold no more weight than any other opinion” The text of Article XXV of the treaty of union…” Mar 14, 10:33
• Aidan on The tint of rose: “@Mia – the effect of Clause XXV is a requirement that both parliaments of England and Scotland shall void any…” Mar 14, 10:26
• Xaracen on The tint of rose: “Correction to an unnoticed error; “They have never been asked to change any part of it, and even if they…” Mar 14, 10:14
• James Barr Gardner on Signal and noise: “The first step in privatising the Scottish NHS will be the SNP advocating “Both Votes SNP”. After that the plan…” Mar 14, 10:14
• Xaracen on The tint of rose: “@ Aidan; Bullshit, Aidan! My initial premise has always been that the sovereignty of Scotland was just as unequivocally real…” Mar 14, 10:07
• Aidan on The tint of rose: “@Mia – we’ve also gone around the houses on this, we get to the point where you say that every…” Mar 14, 09:42
• Mia on The tint of rose: ““you appear to make an absolutely fundamental error which is to treat older laws as taking priority over newer laws,…” Mar 14, 09:22
• Captain Caveman on The tint of rose: “Very informative and decisive post @7:42, Aidan. Hopefully this will conclude and put the matter to rest (finally and long…” Mar 14, 09:19
• Xaracen on The tint of rose: “You could hardly be more wrong, Hatey; it is the English establishment’s interpretation that doesn’t mesh with the constitutional and…” Mar 14, 09:01
• Mia on The tint of rose: ““Your interpretation does not mesh with reality, Xaracen” Actually, Hatey, it is YOUR interpretation the one that does not mesh…” Mar 14, 08:32
• Vivian O’Blivion on Signal and noise: “Former MP for Glasgow South, Stewart McDonald delivers his hagiography for Saint Nicola of Brigadoom. “… preeminent electoral juggernaut”, aye,…” Mar 14, 08:26
• Mia on The tint of rose: ““We voted Remain by 62% on a turnout of 67.2%. By the inexorable laws of maths, we can all see…” Mar 14, 08:05
• Aidan on The tint of rose: “@Xaracen – again the problem is that your reasoning is largely circular, in that you use the conclusion as justifying…” Mar 14, 07:42
• Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: ““Says it all about him, doesn’t it.” Yes, sarah, Swinney the Incredible Husk, the New Toom Tabard, etc. etc. Other…” Mar 14, 07:38
• Hatey McHateface on The tint of rose: “Your interpretation does not mesh with reality, Xaracen. In reality, if the vote was intended to separately determine the fates…” Mar 14, 06:37
• sarah on Off-topic: “I gave that slogan to Swinney during the general election when he visited a nearby heritage site that was central…” Mar 13, 23:24
• sarah on The tint of rose: “@ Mia at 7.30 p.m. Very well explained, Mia – comprehensible to the meanest understanding, one would think.” Mar 13, 23:13
• Xaracen on The tint of rose: “Hatey said; “We voted Remain by 62% on a turnout of 67.2%. By the inexorable laws of maths, we can…” Mar 13, 22:58