The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Exciting Benchmark Reviews update #3

Posted on July 23, 2010 by

Ooh, things just got even more interesting. Viewers following the mysterious tale of Benchmark Reviews and where their fully independent reviews come from will recall that WoSblog's shadowy agents tracked down the text of their glowing review of a $1200 office chair to the website of an online retailer called Smart Furniture. When asked, Smart Furniture asserted that the text was their own original work.

Since then, further developments have transpired. Read on!

The first is that Benchmark Reviews has gone through the text and hastily edited it in several areas to insert qualifiers and disclaimers. For example, on page 4 there's a passage which on our saved copy of the page from a couple of days ago said this:

"Designed by Bill Stumpf (who pioneered the Aeron Chair) and Jeff Weber, the Herman Miller Embody chair goes a step beyond being merely "heath-neutral" [sic]. Over time, it can actually improve the health of the person sitting in it.  Scientific studies have shown that Embody users can experience better circulation, reduced resting heart rates, and less tissue damage around the sitting muscles. Embody promotes natural alignment in the spine, relieving stress across the entire back no matter how you twist and turn. "

Now, however, with no acknowledgement of having been altered, it reads like this (emphasis on changed sections added by WoSblog):

"The Herman Miller Embody Chair was designed by Bill Stumpf (Aeron Chair) and Jeff Weber, who developed the Embody chair to go a step beyond being merely "heath-neutral" [still sic]. According to Herman Miller, over time the Embody chair can actually improve the health of the person sitting in it. There have been several scientific studies (cited below) to have shown that Embody users can experience better circulation, reduced resting heart rates, and less tissue damage around the sitting muscles. Embody is intended to promote natural alignment in the spine, and relieve stress across the entire back."

Things which were previously stated as facts coming straight from the personal experience of the reviewer are now merely quotes of Herman Miller's design aims. The bottom of the page now does indeed provide links to all of the scientific studies praising the chair's health-enhancing qualities, which by an astonishing coincidence were all undertaken by the dedicated scientists at… Herman Miller. Wow! Who saw THAT one coming, eh?

(Other parts of the "review" have had similar hurried makeovers, and you can compare the results for yourself against the original version by downloading the retrieved original files from this link.)

Quite where this leaves Olin Coles' angry insistence in the comments thread that "99.9% of the article is a fully independent review of a self-purchased product" is a tricky one to fathom. Clearly, changing those parts would seem to be an unacknowledged admission that they were not impartial, and were in fact stating Herman Miller PR claims as being the opinion of the reviewer. Why, after all, would an independent reviewer make up unsupported and unqualified claims on a company's behalf in the first place?

So that's one interesting thing. The even better one, though, is that the current version of the "review" has a whole different bunch of advertisements inlaid on all the pages to the ones that were there when the page came to WoSblog's attention. And the site they're advertising is another big surprise.

Because at the time of writing, every inlaid ad across the eight pages of Benchmark Reviews' fully independent review is a link enabling readers to go and buy the chair in question from… Smart Furniture.

Now that's properly intriguing. Because it pretty much obliterates any idea that anyone was copying anyone else's text without their permission, and instead provides what you'd have to call fairly comprehensive proof that independent review site Benchmark Reviews and expensive-chair retailer Smart Furniture are working directly together to flog you these $1200 high-tech bum-rests.

But how, exactly? There are three possible explanations:

1. Benchmark Reviews and Smart Furniture have both simply reprinted a Herman Miller press-release with minor editing. This, of course, would mean that they were both lying about having written the text themselves, and that Benchmark Reviews was explicitly lying to its readers about the review being independent.

2. Smart Furniture did – as they've claimed – write the blurb themselves. Benchmark Reviews must logically then have agreed to print it in the guise of a review (presumably in return for payment) and link that review back to Smart Furniture. That would mean that Benchmark Reviews were shilling their readers by recommending a $1200 chair under the pretence that they'd written an honest review of it.

3. Benchmark Reviews wrote a genuine review themselves, and licenced it to Smart Furniture for use on their retail site. That fails to make sense on several levels, however. Firstly, why (as noted above) would a genuine review feature a load of statements that turned out to be Herman Miller PR claims in need of subsequent alteration? Secondly, why would Smart Furniture present a genuine review as merely part of the chair's specification blurb? Obviously if they published it saying "Look how great this independent review says the chair is!", that would carry a lot more weight as an inducement for people to buy the chair.

We will, of course, continue with our efforts to get to the bottom of this fascinating mystery. Stay tuned!

0 to “Exciting Benchmark Reviews update #3”

  1. VLII says:

    Whatever the end result is, I encourage and applaud the continuing heavy usage of terms like Herman Miller and the Embody Chair (a.k.a. the Herman Miller Embody Chair).  Benchmark Reviews obviously needs some kind of independent review to help its users be aware of the quality of its product.  Whether or not Herman Miller (the makers of the Herman Miller Embody Chair) are a part of all this or not, it would serve potential customers of Herman Miller who are considering buying an Embody Chair to know to be wary of sites like Benchmark Reviews and their reviews of Herman Miller products.

    Reply
  2. coyote says:

    Fascinating?

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    I don't see any chains holding you down, sonny.

    Reply
  4. Cook says:

    A warning to anoyne trusting review sites or indeed magazines. This kind of thing no doubt goes on all the time at varying degrees.

    Reply
  5. Steve Smith says:

    I'm confused!  How can this be when their website (under the 'Legal' tab) clearly says:-
    "It is the policy of this Web Site not to allow third-party influence into the content of any article […] We believe in honesty […] The views and opinions expressed on this Web Site are purely by the author of such content."

    Reply
  6. Hypocee says:

    If their 'reviewer' never touched the text, technically all that's true.

    Reply
  7. Raider says:

    Have you considered that Smart Furniture may have become aware of the review that breached their copyright? They could then have threatened to sue BR but settled. The terms of the settlement being that the review text be edited and Smart Furniture get free advertsising on the site.
    Just a thought to add to the three unlikely sounding possibilities you suggested.

    Reply
  8. Rabbi says:

    How about a fourth possibility?
    BMR lifted the copy wholesale from the SF website. Then you got involved and SF found out. BMR then "pays off" SF with some free advertising.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      I daresay the fourth possibility could be true, but it seems pretty outlandish. The whole reason that anyone started looking into all this business in the first place is that the original BMR “review” was so enormously suspicious, and sounded so much like press-release blurb, and it was already being hastily edited before we discovered the connection to Smart Furniture. Olin Coles’ insanely guilty response also came before anyone had noticed the text appearing on Smart Furniture.

      Reply
  9. DG says:

    "The views and opinions expressed on this Web Site are purely by the author of such content."
    To be fair this is correct, it is the view of the person who actually wrote the content, namely the PR manager for Herman Whatever.

    Reply
  10. Nixon says:

    I miss Ivor Cutler.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Indeed. It’s his best and wisest line, I feel.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,787 Posts, 1,221,941 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Aidan on Just Good Friends: “Yes – if the English were forced to pay the highest possible retail rate (the figure you use is above…Jul 14, 08:10
    • Aidan on Just Good Friends: “You also of course exclude Finland, similar in population size to Scotland and around the same GDP, higher GDP per…Jul 14, 08:01
    • Aidan on Just Good Friends: “Ireland’s GDP is distorted by base erosion and profit shifting, and by the impact of depreciating assets (like aircraft) that…Jul 14, 07:54
    • Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: ““Ireland (no oil), Norway (oil), Switzerland (banking) have GDPs in the range of 600-800B USD. Ours is 200B USD. Liechtenstein…Jul 14, 07:32
    • Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: “Scotland’s renewable energy production will soon be worth £100 billion a year, not that us Scots will see any benefit…Jul 14, 07:22
    • Andrew Kidd on According As We Need Them: “There is another article in the Herald where a female politician is complaining that people are disagreeing with everything she…Jul 13, 23:30
    • Young Lochinvar on According As We Need Them: “Unfortunately yes. Add in the DEI obsessed LibDems onto the list though, the shark lurking under the waves on this…Jul 13, 23:00
    • GM on According As We Need Them: “Very true. Nothing for it but to keep the faith and take the genuine option when it is on offer…Jul 13, 22:58
    • Captain Caveman on According As We Need Them: “@Lorn Excellent post, in my humble opinion. How did we get here?Jul 13, 22:39
    • Shug on According As We Need Them: “What is the Herald and National doing getting tied up with such a bunch of self serving weirdos Are there…Jul 13, 22:35
    • sarah on According As We Need Them: “@ GM: I agree. I can’t wait to see the back of them. We all know people in our own…Jul 13, 21:53
    • Lorn on According As We Need Them: “You still haven’t told us who these paragons of modern political action are, Dan. Actually, I read very widely and…Jul 13, 21:52
    • GM on According As We Need Them: “Aye Sarah, there are plenty of good people out there. That does not make the ‘Scottish’ elite any easier to…Jul 13, 20:41
    • Dunx on Just Good Friends: “And English consumers subsidise Scottish renewables. Your point is ?Jul 13, 20:28
    • holymacmoses on According As We Need Them: “A tweet from our Suzanne on journalistic integrity. Her kitchen is full of pots and kettles:-) “Suzanne McLaughlin @Suzemclaughlin Not…Jul 13, 20:08
    • Dan on According As We Need Them: “Maybe try being a bit more alert and receptive to actually reading and taking in what other folk have said…Jul 13, 20:04
    • willie on According As We Need Them: “The Scottish Government under the SNP and the Green is a quack quango Effijy. No one should be in any…Jul 13, 19:38
    • sarah on According As We Need Them: “@ Lorn at 6.34: “who are these paragons?”. I think Dan may be referring to the Independents for Independence who…Jul 13, 19:21
    • willie on According As We Need Them: “If they didn’t publicly fund these faux charities and their loon ball on line trolls to pump out their unwanted…Jul 13, 19:20
    • agent x on According As We Need Them: ““The Scottish National party has voted heavily in favour of introducing all women shortlists and “balanced” regional lists, reversing decades-long…Jul 13, 18:44
    • Lorn on According As We Need Them: “And who were these paragons, Dan? I have never in my life simply ticked a box because the candidate reflected…Jul 13, 18:34
    • Effijy on According As We Need Them: “So much tax payer cash directed to nonsense quangos. I’ve never yet seen one of these bodies produce anything worthwhile.…Jul 13, 18:33
    • Campbell Clansman on According As We Need Them: “Alba would have to “make a lot of ground” to get to 2% of the vote.Jul 13, 18:26
    • twathater on According As We Need Them: “ALL of this pish is our own fault because we stood by and allowed these fuckwits to gain power, and…Jul 13, 18:12
    • Frank Gillougley on According As We Need Them: “And so it goes. Incestuous faux academics shall speak unto incestuous faux academics funded by us the hoi polloi. The…Jul 13, 17:58
    • Dan on According As We Need Them: “Some did try to start electing decent ordinary individuals who weren’t the usual political clone dross, but youse weren’t interested,…Jul 13, 17:53
    • Bill Fraser on According As We Need Them: “I am wondering if this organisations status as a charity could be challenged under the “Charity Test ” it certainly…Jul 13, 17:51
    • Anthem on According As We Need Them: “Alba could make a lot of ground exposing these so called “charities “, on how much they cost the taxpayer,…Jul 13, 17:51
    • Captain Caveman on Just Good Friends: ““They’rrrrre grrrrreat!” 😀 https://www.frostedflakes.us/tony-the-tigerJul 13, 17:27
    • Lorn on According As We Need Them: “The one thing about politicians that I have discovered in my life is that, male or female, black or white,…Jul 13, 17:24
  • A tall tale



↑ Top