The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Back to business

Posted on December 01, 2011 by

Okay, so after yesterday's fit of grand polemic for St Andrew's Day we've got some normal news to catch up on again. We left off mentioning this before because the Newsnet Scotland server had a bizarre extended outage and because the feature itself is horribly written, but the statistical fact that the mainstream Scottish media is 11,319 times more likely to run a story based on the SNP being accused of some terrible wrong than they are to do the same thing to the Tories, and that "accused" stories directed against the SNP make up 88% of all such articles, is definitely worth examining if you haven't already.

Meanwhile, the BBC and Herald run a pair of bone-chilling pieces about the economic future of the UK (the latter one also echoed in the Scotsman). In the coming years before the independence referendum, it's increasingly clear that it's going to get harder and harder for the Unionist parties to credibly push the "stronger together, weaker apart" line, because it's hard to imagine how an independent Scotland bursting with natural resources could possibly be in a bigger mess than successive Labour and Tory governments have left Britain in, even if we elected The Krankies to run it for a laugh.

The Scotsman also runs with an interesting piece linking the gay marriage consultation with the independence referendum, highlighting comments by former SNP leader Gordon Wilson suggesting that the SNP can ill afford to alienate a single voter in the run-up to the vote with such controversial policies. It's a fair enough point, except that with Labour and the Lib Dems on the same side as the SNP on the issue, and the Tories actually led by a lesbian, we're not sure there's much scope there for the opposition to exploit it politically. (Curiously, while the Scotsman piece makes great play of Wilson's SNP connection, it neglects to mention anywhere that Bashir Maan, one of the other opponents of gay marriage extensively quoted in the piece along with Cardinal Keith O'Brien, is a prominent former Labour figure.)

And as with the sectarianism bill and minimum pricing, the SNP is wisely front-loading its more contentious policies into the first half of the Parliament – presumably counting on any furore having long died down by the time of the referendum, as armies of angry Old-Firm-supporting gay couples enraged by the price of booze for their weddings fail to materialise on the streets.

Over in the blogosphere, Kate Higgins takes a surprise angle on the Chancellor's offer yesterday of £50m to upgrade/preserve the London-to-Scotland Sleeper train – contingent on the Scottish Government putting up the same amount of money – by advocating that the SNP should decline the offer. We see her point, to be honest – we suspect the main users of the service are MPs, and that normal folk won't miss it particularly much. (We're also not sure how urgently it needs £100m spent on it, or what that money would deliver.) The sleeper is so pricey that you might as well either get an earlier train and book a night in a hotel, or take a cheap flight to Edinburgh or Glasgow and make the rest of your train journey from there. Either option costs about the same as the sleeper premium, and doesn't involve shutting yourself in a tiny rattling shoebox with a complete stranger for the night. (As we were horrified to discover was the case the first time we ever used the service. We didn't get a lot of sleep.)

Malc Harvey has almost finished Thinking Unpopular Thoughts on the state of the Scottish parties, having rounded up the Scottish Tories, Lib Dems and Greens this week and promising his views on the SNP later today. His conclusions aren't encouraging for any of the first three, with the most intriguing suggestion being that the Lib Dems may have a future as a party of the centre-right, essentially occupying the ground the Tories declined to move onto under Murdo Fraser – if, that is, the Tories don't dump Ruth Davidson quickly and get there first. It's certainly true that there's a substantial minority of Scottish voters of centre-right inclination waiting for someone convincing to vote for, and neither the Lib Dems nor the Tories are going to get anywhere in Scotland for the forseeable future as they are. We'll be watching that space.

And with that, we're off to await First Minister's Questions, and see if Iain Gray has the sheer suicidal gall to challenge the SNP on walking through picket lines yesterday, exactly as Labour's leader and MPs did at Westminster

Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,408 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • AndrewR on The shifting sands of memory: “I don’t agree with Orcs, but it can wait for another day. The rest, yes. Spain imprisoning Catalan politicians for…May 24, 19:06
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Just back checked and a post I submitted on Tuesday seems to have got lost in the ether; so, ere…May 24, 18:57
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““And no religion too” Then spend the rest of your life in hiding from the fatwah.May 24, 18:48
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Did I really, Xaracen? “The parliament is the only singular aspect of the Union”. Your words. I listed some common…May 24, 18:43
    • Rob on The shifting sands of memory: “You seriously want the SG to have MORE powers, they have made such a mess of the ones they already…May 24, 18:36
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Of course. A real majority in favour, not an imaginary one. And politicians competent enough to run the country, not…May 24, 18:35
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “That’s a lot of “can’t”s Mia. As always in the real world, the question arises: Says you and whose army?…May 24, 18:28
    • AndrewR on The shifting sands of memory: “I wrote a post that hasn’t appeared, quite possibly because it was too long, which it most definitely was. If…May 24, 18:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Good to hear we’re generating twice as much leccy as we need in the particular weather conditions prevailing when you…May 24, 18:21
    • Xaracen on The shifting sands of memory: “You totally missed the point, Hatey.May 24, 18:21
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““Why write one paragraph when 10 will do?” Why stop at 10? Why not 100? I doubt Mia writes them…May 24, 18:01
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““how is it that the central state holds the power to decide if a part of that state gets independence?…May 24, 17:57
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Naw. It has rained for the first time in a month and some of the regulars got caught in it.…May 24, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““It would have made no difference” Keep going, NC, you’re half way there! Believe the 2014 vote DID go to…May 24, 17:40
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Mia, I am aware that my personal view that the Scots are not in the treaty at all due to…May 24, 17:37
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “That’s always been my understanding of the situation, Andy. We already have an example during the Brexit process. All the…May 24, 17:34
    • AndrewR on The shifting sands of memory: “Do you know what usually happens? Czechoslovakia, for instance? Most laws aren’t going to be contentious, like your votes for…May 24, 17:33
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““The UK only looks like a single state …” When I go through immigration, in either direction. When I am…May 24, 17:17
    • AndrewR on The shifting sands of memory: “Scotland couldn’t enter into a treaty with the Westminster parliament of Britain because it didn’t exist yet. But your next…May 24, 17:03
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “For those that wish for the treaty of union to remain as a status quo sure we see many instances…May 24, 16:20
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “It is my belief that even if the 2014 vote had gone to ‘YES’ it would have made no difference…May 24, 16:17
    • Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “The boundary change is a red herring. Until and unless Scottish voters grow a pair and take their independence rather…May 24, 15:53
    • Andy Wiltshire on The shifting sands of memory: “My tongue-out-of-cheek point is that either a newly independent Scotland (brought into existence by a court declaring the 1707 Act…May 24, 15:45
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “@Mia – “Korea” isn’t a “binary state”May 24, 15:45
    • AndrewR on The shifting sands of memory: “I’ve got a more sensible post below, but I was struck by the same point as Andy Wiltshire. I don’t…May 24, 15:31
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “Absolutely, James Cheyne. Which also brings up another question: if the UK of Great Britain and NI was a unitary…May 24, 15:06
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““Can you give me a give example of where the concept of a binary state is recognised in intentional law…May 24, 14:57
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Dan, Having had a quick reminder after reading the link you provided, Question, if each territorial state remains in tact…May 24, 14:36
    • Dan on The shifting sands of memory: “Smith Commission report stated… “nothing in this report prevents Scotland becoming an independent country in the future, should the people…May 24, 13:08
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “Can you give me a give example of where the concept of a binary state is recognised in intentional law…May 24, 12:43
  • A tall tale



↑ Top